Comments on: Jesse Ventura for Senate? http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/ Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:25:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Bobo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-657360 Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:46:21 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-657360 I may not like everything he say's...but he did fight for the right to say it !!!! It's refreshing to see someone in the arena who will not owe anyone favors..who is willing to say what he thinks...right or wrong...and tell it like it is...he did it when he was gov. and I'm sure he would do it again...people might not like it but you have to admire his courage to stand up for what he thinks. Could make for an interesting election once again !!! I may not like everything he say’s…but he did fight for the right to say it ! It’s refreshing to see someone in the arena who will not owe anyone favors..who is willing to say what he thinks…right or wrong…and tell it like it is…he did it when he was gov. and I’m sure he would do it again…people might not like it but you have to admire his courage to stand up for what he thinks.
Could make for an interesting election once again

]]> by: Andy http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609818 Sun, 18 May 2008 00:29:00 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609818 "The same Dr. Jones who’s WTC collapse theories were dismissed by the structural and fire safety engineering faculty at his own university?" Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth http://www.ae911truth.org/ “The same Dr. Jones who’s WTC collapse theories were dismissed by the structural and fire safety engineering faculty at his own university?”

Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/

]]> by: Stefan http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609343 Sat, 17 May 2008 11:57:18 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609343 Hopefully Ventura can join the senate race as LP candidate. I do not like his criticism of organized religion though. He could well be able to get the LP its first senate seat. I heard Al Franken has some issues with 70 000 in taxes he was supposed to pay or something like that...so the Demos are not too happy and enthused with him. This is a perfect scenario. Ventura has beaten the GOP incumbant for the governorship and Al Franken would be quite weakened, so a substantial amount of Democrats may choose to vote for Ventura instead of Franken, plus all the Independents for Ventura and disaffected Republicans and the Libertarians and Greens of course. The Ron Paul meetup groups there may also vote for him and organize fundraising. Perfect storm for Ventura! Hopefully Ventura can join the senate race as LP candidate. I do not like his criticism of organized religion though. He could well be able to get the LP its first senate seat. I heard Al Franken has some issues with 70 000 in taxes he was supposed to pay or something like that…so the Demos are not too happy and enthused with him. This is a perfect scenario. Ventura has beaten the GOP incumbant for the governorship and Al Franken would be quite weakened, so a substantial amount of Democrats may choose to vote for Ventura instead of Franken, plus all the Independents for Ventura and disaffected Republicans and the Libertarians and Greens of course. The Ron Paul meetup groups there may also vote for him and organize fundraising. Perfect storm for Ventura!

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609127 Sat, 17 May 2008 04:25:52 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609127 <blockquote>An idiot like Ventura who responds to every challenge with “were you a Navy Seal” is a conspiracy nut. Whatever valid points he may have go out the window when he can’t discuss an issue with intelligence.</blockquote> I have seen him discuss the issue on multiple occasions and have never heard this Navy Seal response. Besides, you are using a red herring - which isn't "intelligent".
An idiot like Ventura who responds to every challenge with “were you a Navy Seal” is a conspiracy nut. Whatever valid points he may have go out the window when he can’t discuss an issue with intelligence.

I have seen him discuss the issue on multiple occasions and have never heard this Navy Seal response. Besides, you are using a red herring – which isn’t “intelligent”.

]]> by: DrGonzo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609025 Sat, 17 May 2008 02:00:12 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-609025 <i>Good, then you agree that: Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are [a conspiracy nut] as well. Again, I have already explained the difference. Just because you believe in a conspiracy does not make you a conspiracy nut. An idiot like Ventura who responds to every challenge with "were you a Navy Seal" is a conspiracy nut. Whatever valid points he may have go out the window when he can't discuss an issue with intelligence.</i> Good, then you agree that: Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are [a conspiracy nut] as well.

Again, I have already explained the difference. Just because you believe in a conspiracy does not make you a conspiracy nut.

An idiot like Ventura who responds to every challenge with “were you a Navy Seal” is a conspiracy nut. Whatever valid points he may have go out the window when he can’t discuss an issue with intelligence.

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608695 Fri, 16 May 2008 20:27:54 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608695 <blockquote>No, I’m pretty sure I understand it.</blockquote> Good, then you agree that: Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are [a conspiracy nut] as well.
No, I’m pretty sure I understand it.

Good, then you agree that: Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are [a conspiracy nut] as well.

]]> by: DrGonzo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608687 Fri, 16 May 2008 20:21:11 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608687 <i>What makes you think the “conspiracy nuts” have not done the same thing? I have already told you the difference between a conspiracy nut and someone who can discuss the issue with intelligence. The people who watch and worship Loose Change are the conspiracy nuts. </i><i>You don’t seem to understand the meaning of the word “conspiracy”.</i> No, I'm pretty sure I understand it. What makes you think the “conspiracy nuts” have not done the same thing?

I have already told you the difference between a conspiracy nut and someone who can discuss the issue with intelligence. The people who watch and worship Loose Change are the conspiracy nuts.

You don’t seem to understand the meaning of the word “conspiracy”.

No, I’m pretty sure I understand it.

]]> by: NewFederalist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608595 Fri, 16 May 2008 19:08:03 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608595 I prefer my conspiracy nuts unsalted... high blood pressure, you know. I prefer my conspiracy nuts unsalted… high blood pressure, you know.

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608590 Fri, 16 May 2008 19:04:52 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608590 <blockquote>No, I don’t. I examine opinions of both sides. That leads me to the conclusions I have.</blockquote> What makes you think the "conspiracy nuts" have not done the same thing? <blockquote>No, there is a big difference between conspiracy nut, and someone who uses intelligence to question a situation.</blockquote> You don't seem to understand the meaning of the word "conspiracy".
No, I don’t. I examine opinions of both sides. That leads me to the conclusions I have.

What makes you think the “conspiracy nuts” have not done the same thing?

No, there is a big difference between conspiracy nut, and someone who uses intelligence to question a situation.

You don’t seem to understand the meaning of the word “conspiracy”.

]]> by: Chris http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608500 Fri, 16 May 2008 17:44:46 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608500 <blockquote>Is Dr. Steven Jones, formerly of BYU also a “complete conspiracy nut?.” </blockquote> You mean the same Dr. Jones who claims to have discovered ancient Mayan archaeological evidence that Jesus visited America? The same Dr. Jones who's claim to fame at BYU was his work on cold fusion? The same Dr. Jones who's WTC collapse theories were dismissed by the structural and fire safety engineering faculty at his own university? The same Dr. Jones that refuses to even CITE the hundreds of pages of peer-reviewed literature in established journals concerning the collapse? If you mean that Dr. Jones, then yes. He's a nut.
Is Dr. Steven Jones, formerly of BYU also a “complete conspiracy nut?.”

You mean the same Dr. Jones who claims to have discovered ancient Mayan archaeological evidence that Jesus visited America?

The same Dr. Jones who’s claim to fame at BYU was his work on cold fusion?

The same Dr. Jones who’s WTC collapse theories were dismissed by the structural and fire safety engineering faculty at his own university?

The same Dr. Jones that refuses to even CITE the hundreds of pages of peer-reviewed literature in established journals concerning the collapse?

If you mean that Dr. Jones, then yes. He’s a nut.

]]> by: DrGonzo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608431 Fri, 16 May 2008 16:47:58 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608431 <i>Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are as well.</i> No, there is a big difference between conspiracy nut, and someone who uses intelligence to question a situation. <i>And you don’t?</i> No, I don't. I examine opinions of both sides. That leads me to the conclusions I have. I won't turn this into a 9/11 conspiracy argument because I'm sure it had been done far to many times. Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are as well.

No, there is a big difference between conspiracy nut, and someone who uses intelligence to question a situation.

And you don’t?

No, I don’t. I examine opinions of both sides. That leads me to the conclusions I have. I won’t turn this into a 9/11 conspiracy argument because I’m sure it had been done far to many times.

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608422 Fri, 16 May 2008 16:40:16 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608422 <blockquote>I have an overall problem with conspiracy nuts to begin with. They continually disregard facts that don’t fit their agenda </blockquote> And you don't?
I have an overall problem with conspiracy nuts to begin with. They continually disregard facts that don’t fit their agenda

And you don’t?

]]> by: disinter http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608418 Fri, 16 May 2008 16:37:55 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608418 <blockquote>The man is a complete conspiracy nut.</blockquote> Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are as well.
The man is a complete conspiracy nut.

Unless you think that no two or more people have ever planned anything, then you are as well.

]]> by: Austrian Economist http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608404 Fri, 16 May 2008 16:29:09 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608404 Let's get him into the LP right away! He can carry the Libertarian banner in what would become one of the highest profile Senate races of the year! Let’s get him into the LP right away!

He can carry the Libertarian banner in what would become one of the highest profile Senate races of the year!

]]> by: DrGonzo http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608401 Fri, 16 May 2008 16:26:40 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/05/16/jesse-ventura-for-senate/#comment-608401 <i>Ok. Where are the “facts” to support that? This man was elected. Served. Did some good. Asks for new investigations. I’ve not read his latest book, so I’m truly asking here. Is Dr. Steven Jones, formerly of BYU also a “complete conspiracy nut?.” Is Dr. Ed Mitchell? </i> I don't know who Dr. Steven Jones is, but I have a feeling he doesn't respond to every challenge with "were you a Navy Seal?" That is my problem with Ventura. Rather than respond with intelligence, that is the answer he gives. I have an overall problem with conspiracy nuts to begin with. They continually disregard facts that don't fit their agenda (like the 10 times the idiots who created Loose Change have changed their arguments). I have no problem with people who can honestly question the accounts. None whatsoever. It should be done. I can't stand people who don't listen to the opinion of others. Ok. Where are the “facts” to support that? This man was elected. Served. Did some good. Asks for new investigations.

I’ve not read his latest book, so I’m truly asking here.

Is Dr. Steven Jones, formerly of BYU also a “complete conspiracy nut?.” Is Dr. Ed Mitchell?

I don’t know who Dr. Steven Jones is, but I have a feeling he doesn’t respond to every challenge with “were you a Navy Seal?” That is my problem with Ventura. Rather than respond with intelligence, that is the answer he gives.

I have an overall problem with conspiracy nuts to begin with. They continually disregard facts that don’t fit their agenda (like the 10 times the idiots who created Loose Change have changed their arguments).

I have no problem with people who can honestly question the accounts. None whatsoever. It should be done. I can’t stand people who don’t listen to the opinion of others.

]]>