I differ with THAT remark completely. The LP is very ‘wishy-washy’ on the illegal immigration issue and border security and several others. The LP has a history of being very generic and cloudy on several issues. The platform of the Constitution party is VERY “clear”, on immigration and all the others. ......”BARR none! We would welcome a debate with Chuck and all the other presidential candidates..Barr none! ANYTIME! Chuck will blow them all out of the water…hands down..Barr none!
-Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.)USAF
NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION
Constitution party…www.nvets.org

oldgus,

I doubt very much that Ron Paul would have run for the CP nomination. My guess is if Ron Paul was to have run for the presidency via a third party it went have been through the Libertarian Party since he is a lifetime member, former nominee, and had the total support of the party. The CP just isn’t a very good vehicle for a third party.

what are you going to do when Ron Paul endorses Bob Barr?

What are you going to do when he doesn’t?

You continue to duck the question; what are you going to do when Ron Paul endorses Bob Barr?

Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution
Partyi, is, in my opinion, closer the Ron Paul than Bob Barr.

Baldwin is FAR more libertarian than Barf.

So we have a Republican and CP prez candidate running that are more libertarian than the Libertarian Party’s nominee. Is this not a tad bit strange?

So is this one; excepting, for example, a future Ron Paul admonition to support someone, Steve Kubby’s no longer supporting the Barr/Root ticket, or the like (and then I’d look at their reasoning and reevaluate my choice).

I’m not overly impressed with the criticism of Congressman Barr based on his voting record in Congress; I’m more interested in how he will run the campaign, or likely govern in the future should he be elected again.

While one’s past is one indicator of future behavior, it seems some hold the possibility that Mr. Barr, or anyone for that matter, could learn as impossible.

It seems to me, based on his actions over the past year or two, that Mr. Barr has indeed learned from his past, and become, if not purely, then sufficiently Libertarian for me to be able to support his campaign and urge others to do so. I just wish I could do it without any “mental reservation or equivocation” whatsoever. I’m hopeful as the campaign goes on, that that will become the case.

Joe

www.TheDoctorWillFreeYouNow.com

“Is that even a possibility Ron Paul would be open to?”
No chance. McCain doesn’t even speak to Dr. Paul.

“It seems if McCain truly fears that Barr/Root could tip the balance to Obama, Ron Paul as VP would more than allay that fear.”
McCain is convinced he can win without us.

The GOP is doing all it can to shut Dr. Paul and his supporters out. So this Ron Paul supporter is supporting Barr/Root. If the LP can’t make any headway with a ticket this strong, it can’t make any headway.

Anyway this Ron Paul supporter is most definitely voting for Barr in November. I like Baldwin but the CP just isn’t nearly as viable a party as the LP in terms of stuff like ballot access to even consider voting for him (access in less than 25 states is weak; I literally can’t vote for him here as in most places). What I had hoped for was the two parties to fuse and give us some kind of Barr/Baldwin ticket. Since writing in for Paul isn’t an productive option Barr it is and I’ll be working hard for him.

Is that even a possibility Ron Paul would be open to?

It seems if McCain truly fears that Barr/Root could tip the balance to Obama, Ron Paul as VP would more than allay that fear.

Joe