Comments on: Chuck Baldwin Interview Tonight

by: dogsunstuden

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:35:37 +0000

head red house pets boat free

by: Cody Quirk

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:06:29 +0000

why doesn’t the CP be honest and call themselves ‘the abortion prohibition republicrat party?’.. (btw stick your stinking noses in your own stinking wombs, idiots)

= Because we want to save innocent lives, not end them.

...CP cheerleaders..please point me to baldwig’s best writing/thinking on ‘the money thing’..i’ve looked but found nothing which indicates he has much of a clue..

= Be specific on this ‘money thing’.

..of course neither does barf or the rest of the 25-dollar-haircut-on-a-5-dollar-head republicrats! ;o)

= Barr is way more a ‘republican’ then Chuck is.

by: Cody Quirk

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:03:56 +0000

Yes, the CP is very Christian-oriented, but we state this in the Preamble of our Platform:............”While it is true that some Party members have been highly prejudiced against others of other faiths, including members of the LDS Church (Mormons), which I am a member of too.”

= Let’s include the next sentence.

“...We have been working on becoming more inclusive to other conservatives out there and more mainstream thinking. Plus you would find those kinds of people no longer in our Party, anymore:)”

Why can’t you just stick with one screen name, or simply give your real name “prolifer”?

Or should I call you “promurderer”, since your approch to abortion is ‘our way or the highway and to hell with stepping stones to reach our goal’ attitude.

by: Clark

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:35:31 +0000

why doesn’t the CP be honest and call themselves ‘the abortion prohibition republicrat party?’.. (btw stick your stinking noses in your own stinking wombs, idiots)

...CP cheerleaders..please point me to baldwig’s best writing/thinking on ‘the money thing’..i’ve looked but found nothing which indicates he has much of a clue..

..of course neither does barf or the rest of the 25-dollar-haircut-on-a-5-dollar-head republicrats! ;o)

by: Me

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:10:58 +0000

“My name is Cody Quirk, I am a member and local leader of the Constitution Party, while I am in 100% in agreement with you about John and his religiously tyrannical intentions, OUR Party is not a Theocratic Party!
Yes, the CP is very Christian-oriented, but we state this in the Preamble of our Platform:............”While it is true that some Party members have been highly prejudiced against others of other faiths, including members of the LDS Church (Mormons), which I am a member of too.”

From the comments section of http://positiveliberty.com/2006/03/the-american-viewof-theocracy.html

Seems Cody is a Mormon.

by: Cody Quirk

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:06:22 +0000

What denomination do you belong to that finds that labeling people you disagree with as “faggots” acceptable? I’m curious…

= It’s the ‘Church of I don’t always put up with BS here.’

by: Larry Breazeale,Msgt.(ret.)USAFR

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:22:00 +0000

To you so-called ‘Prolifer’, & a few others (probably Barr boys..)
Be advised, ‘sunny boys’...Chuck Baldwin is going to surprise a whole lot of you guys & gals in the next couple of weeks! His campaign officially opens up soon and a new national headquarters too. Stand by to stand by!
It will be nothing like the Perouka campaign in 2004. NO COMPARISON.
A lot of Ron Paulers are already jumping on board to help and a lot of ex-republicans disgusted with “McAmnesty McCain”. There will be EVEN MORE people, more than we can handle, in the days ahead, AFTER the GOP convention, that have already said they will get active in Chuck’s campaign, AFTER the dust clears at the GOP convention. THAT is excellant ‘intell’. The more “McAmnesty McCain”, “Obama-nation” and “Barr-none” open the holes in their face, with political gas….the more obvious the only choice is CHUCK BALDWIN, for America. Those that do NOT vote for Chuck….shame on you.Chuck did NOT compromise anything!
Try reading our platform on pro-life . It is in there for ALL to see. I am proud Chuck is our candidate. I am a Christian CATHOLIC and very pro-life and I feel VERY comfortable with Chuck. NOTHING ELSE MATTERS…if we do not protect our borders! “ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION” is the #1 REAL ISSUE. While the politicians are promising the world to the voters…our borders are evaporizing! The CP is the ONLY PARTY trying to do something about it. I say to all of you who seem to have your heads in the clouds-
LEAD,FOLLOW or GET OUT OF THE WAY.

-Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.)USAF
NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION
of the CONSTITUTION party…www.nvets.org

by: RLP

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:10:51 +0000

What denomination do you belong to that finds that labeling people you disagree with as “faggots” acceptable? I’m curious…

by: Cody Quirk

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:06:02 +0000

It certainly wouldn’t have anything to do with being embarrassed about Barr raising 5x as much money…

= Why would Chuck care about Barr’s campaign?

Nice “faggot” comment, BTW. You fit in with the Christian fundies nicely.

= Not as good as you fit.

by: RLP

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:00:20 +0000

Yeah, I’m sure the donation thing is probably just a technical screw-up.

It certainly wouldn’t have anything to do with being embarrassed about Barr raising 5x as much money…

Nice “faggot” comment, BTW. You fit in with the Christian fundies nicely.

by: Cody Quirk

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:43:41 +0000

BTW, has there been any efforts to get Peroutka official write-in status at all?

Or what about the AHP getting on the ballot, any chance?

Guess not.

by: Cody Quirk

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:42:14 +0000

Why did Balwin take down his donation page?

= I dunno, who’s Balwin?

Yeah, that was strange. I guess it could have been because his candidacy is turning out to be a flop. Who knows?

= Or maybe to make faggots like you speculate.

by: Prolifer

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:50:04 +0000

Yeah, that was strange. I guess it could have been because his candidacy is turning out to be a flop. Who knows?

by: RLP

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:26:50 +0000

Cody,

Why did Balwin take down his donation page?

by: Cody Quirk

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:18:59 +0000

The CP is looking like they may not even match ‘04 results.

= I am going to jump on you when you are proven wrong this November.