Lid, make that 2 at least for this current election cycle. It’s all about the primaries.

...you know i can’t help thinking that when you $tooooooooooopid$ don’t understand the origin, nature, etc. of that “thing” ‘at the root of the immigration problem’...(and you fool$ surely don’t!) well, your ideas as to ‘$olving the problem’ are most likely $hit!..

..btw, it’s been my experience that ‘fear of poverty’ (‘measured,’ of course, in said FEDERAL RESERVE TOKENS) is one of the most common reasons/excuses for ‘having/getting an abortion’...

..so again here, you stinking busybody abortion prohibition republicreeps are at a loss as to the root$ of ‘the problem’.. ;o)

...and PLEASE BE QUIET ABOUT BOB BARF

...you denver dummies, (and i mean DUMMIES..we’d be better off with ‘none of the above’) got snookered by this OBVIOUS STINKING REPUBLICAN OOGA BOOGA ARTIST..with more baggage than laguardia..

..so at least now, STFU ABOUT IT..and maybe your shame will gather less notice..

(i can’t wait to rub in the fool faces of some apparent goddamned idiots here, stinking glen beck’s stinking words come this october as to barf vs. mcsame..maybe then, you apparent fucking idiots, you’ll figure out that even with a suckhole stinking republican as LP pres. candidate, the talking heads WILL ALWAYS $HILL FOR THE STINKING REPUBLICRAT $TATUS QUO..

...in your face..but have a good day anyway.. ;o)

Over where I am, I’m experiencing this year cooler weather than a year or four ago, not hotter. The “global warmists” are mentioning the melting of snow etc., but then you have these facts. Maybe one should talk about regional global warming and regional global cooling?

A tip for the “global warmists”: move to Canada, Alaska, SIberia, Greenland, Antartica etc. if you are to concerned about hotter weather…that will cool your thoughts off…hopefully.

So what to do then? Apparently the global warming haters thinks we should just go on and pollute forever. At some point in time, someone has to take a lead and make us pollute less. It’s not rocket science.

Government doesn’t have to decide on exactly what type of less polluting energy source to go for, but a good start is to get rid of oil dependency. Carbon tax might be one way to do it.

The free market is awesome at coming up with alternatives when their profit is at jeopardy.

I may not have been clear about my own stances on global warming. Here is my position on global warming:

“I think global warming is bullshit.”—Wes Benedict, June 8, 2008.

‘I don’t pay any attention to that. . . . We heard it when we did some investigations of Waco, the same sort of stuff. We’ve got to move beyond that. I mean there are real problems facing us and the world that we can actually do something about without worrying about conspiratories [sic] of things past.’

Whatever Barr may have said in 2003, his position in this 2008 interview is that the possibility of government misconduct related to Waco is at this time not worth investigating.

Barr was an “effective” questioner of government witnesses during the 1995 House Waco siege hearings on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Federal Bureau of Investigation actions against the Branch Davidians in 1993, sponsored by subcomittees of the House Judiciary Committee and Government Reform and Oversight Committee.[54] Barr has written: “The hearing, was a farce: a virtual lovefest, during which members of the Clinton Administration responded to softball questions from their colleagues in the House with superficial answers, and Republican queries were ignored or glossed over with disdain, if not outright contempt.”[55] Barr called for Congress to reopen investigations, but senior House Republicans refused.[56] In 2003 testimony submitted to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Barr wrote: “[T]here remains time to turn back the constitutional clock and roll back excessive post-9/11 powers before we turn the corner into another Japanese internment or, closer to our own experiences, before we witness a legally sanctioned Ruby Ridge or Waco scenario.”

Bob Barr is dismissive of the possibility of government wrongdoing in connection with Waco, or at least of any worth investigating. It might lead one to question Barr’s commitment to civil liberties, which otherwise often seems to be the area of libertarian concern in which he is the most interested and most sincere.

Well that’s the whole point, isn’t it? We don’t know what’s been done. If we knew what had been done, we could judge the matter from its objective content, but we don’t. Its precisely that aspect that Barr denies us, perhaps with a purpose of obfuscating, perhaps not. Again we don’t know. The rest that you bring us, the clearly unestablished fact of ill health, the touching scenes of tender support, and all of that in the context of what the former Mrs. Barr is known to have alleged was a extramarital affair, all of that is utterly irrelevant morally. If Barr signed a check, he’s complicit, if he didn’t, he isn’t. Period, end of sentence.

‘My motives must remain in the depository of my own breast. My arguments will be open to all, and may be judged of by all.’