<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Bob Barr favors Clinton (Bill) over Bush (Dubya)</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eric</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665724</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665724</guid>
					<description>Carol:

I think Harold sounds like the Borg. &quot;Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Carol:</p>
	<p>I think Harold sounds like the Borg. &#8220;Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carol</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665714</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665714</guid>
					<description>Harold S:

You kinda remind me of Tokyo Rose....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Harold S:</p>
	<p>You kinda remind me of Tokyo Rose&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Dasbach</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665219</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-665219</guid>
					<description>Wes,

Since you asked:

I donated $2300 to Barr pre-nomination and have pledged an additional $2300 post-nomination. Had Mary been nominated, I would have donated $2300 to her campaign. I also donated $2300 to Ron Paul's campaign.

I'm not a member of the Reform Caucus, but was a member of the platform committee and strongly support the platform adopted in Denver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wes,</p>
	<p>Since you asked:</p>
	<p>I donated $2300 to Barr pre-nomination and have pledged an additional $2300 post-nomination. Had Mary been nominated, I would have donated $2300 to her campaign. I also donated $2300 to Ron Paul&#8217;s campaign.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not a member of the Reform Caucus, but was a member of the platform committee and strongly support the platform adopted in Denver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: disinter</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661693</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661693</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Remember, he is not a federal prosecutor or legal adviser now, but the leader of a political party that want to make inroads.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;How anyone thinks libertarians are supposed to live in the same big tent with neocons is incomprehensible, there is absolutely no place in the LP for them. Recovering neocons are welcome in the party to learn about our philosophy, but not to lead it.&quot;

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Conservative-Takeover--by-Darren-Wolfe-080528-575.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>
<blockquote>Remember, he is not a federal prosecutor or legal adviser now, but the leader of a political party that want to make inroads.</blockquote></p>
	<p>&#8220;How anyone thinks libertarians are supposed to live in the same big tent with neocons is incomprehensible, there is absolutely no place in the LP for them. Recovering neocons are welcome in the party to learn about our philosophy, but not to lead it.&#8221;</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Conservative-Takeover&#8212;by-Darren-Wolfe-080528-575.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Conservative-Takeover&#8212;by-Darren-Wolfe-080528-575.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661500</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661500</guid>
					<description>OK, I'm ready to accept the fact that Bob Barr's mustache has a fascinating history but I'm far more interested in learning whether he signed a check to pay for an abortion his ex-wife is said to have had several years ago. Bob was asked this question on Larry King Live at the time of the Clinton impeachment imbroglio but was unresponsive. If Bob's going to be leading the forces for liberty in November, one wonders if he'd ever been formally complicit morally in snuffing out the liberties of some innocent little one who God's not going to forget in an entirely different kind of November one day. Did Bob ever write such a check? Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK, I&#8217;m ready to accept the fact that Bob Barr&#8217;s mustache has a fascinating history but I&#8217;m far more interested in learning whether he signed a check to pay for an abortion his ex-wife is said to have had several years ago. Bob was asked this question on Larry King Live at the time of the Clinton impeachment imbroglio but was unresponsive. If Bob&#8217;s going to be leading the forces for liberty in November, one wonders if he&#8217;d ever been formally complicit morally in snuffing out the liberties of some innocent little one who God&#8217;s not going to forget in an entirely different kind of November one day. Did Bob ever write such a check? Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wes Benedict</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661463</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661463</guid>
					<description>Looking at that low-quality PDF thing hurts my eyes.  I'm unable to search the pdf.  Is there an efficient way to search for Benedict or Capozzi to for evidence of donations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Looking at that low-quality <span class="caps">PDF</span> thing hurts my eyes.  I&#8217;m unable to search the pdf.  Is there an efficient way to search for Benedict or Capozzi to for evidence of donations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arthur DiBianca</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661394</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661394</guid>
					<description>There's a Barr 2008 Presidential Committee report here:

http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00450841</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There&#8217;s a Barr 2008 Presidential Committee report here:</p>
	<p><a href='http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00450841' rel='nofollow'>http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?C00450841</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wes Benedict</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661377</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661377</guid>
					<description>When do the FEC reports for Barr's campaign come out.  I want to make sure all the Retard Caucus members donated $2300 like I did (even though I voted for Mary at the convention).  

Capozzi, I'm sure you've already contributed $2300, haven't you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When do the <span class="caps">FEC</span> reports for Barr&#8217;s campaign come out.  I want to make sure all the Retard Caucus members donated $2300 like I did (even though I voted for Mary at the convention).</p>
	<p>Capozzi, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve already contributed $2300, haven&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene Trosper</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661337</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661337</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;#  disinter Says:
June 20th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Brain-dead power-mongers usually have mustaches. Notice that cops usually have them, oh and drug war prosecutors like Barf.
&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, and don't forget the raving mad John Stossel and the evil L. Neil Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>#  disinter Says:<br />
June 20th, 2008 at 10:44 pm</p>
	<p>Brain-dead power-mongers usually have mustaches. Notice that cops usually have them, oh and drug war prosecutors like Barf.<br />
</i></p>
	<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t forget the raving mad John Stossel and the evil L. Neil Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gene Trosper</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661336</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661336</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;#  Robert Capozzi Says:
June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 am

harold,
do you read minds?
&lt;/i&gt;

No, I think Harold is finely tuned into the hearts and minds of the average American voter from sea to shining sea. His political acumen must not be questioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>#  Robert Capozzi Says:<br />
June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 am</p>
	<p>harold,<br />
do you read minds?<br />
</i></p>
	<p>No, I think Harold is finely tuned into the hearts and minds of the average American voter from sea to shining sea. His political acumen must not be questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Capozzi</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661218</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661218</guid>
					<description>harold,
do you read minds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>harold,<br />
do you read minds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harold S</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661215</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661215</guid>
					<description>Barr in no way cares about the Libertarian Party.  He only cares about himself.  His campaign will amount to squat.  Nothing.  The average American doesn't know or care that he is the Libertarian candidate.  The nation as a whole hears nothing he is spouting.  Waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Barr in no way cares about the Libertarian Party.  He only cares about himself.  His campaign will amount to squat.  Nothing.  The average American doesn&#8217;t know or care that he is the Libertarian candidate.  The nation as a whole hears nothing he is spouting.  Waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Tomlin</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661202</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661202</guid>
					<description>'He answered that in the video; because the last 8 years of Congresses didn’t have the balls to follow through. Good answer, BTW'

That's not exactly what he said. He said Congress has failed to gather evidence. Either way it's not a good answer. There's enough evidence in public to start impeachment proceedings, in the course of which more evidence would be found. Saying 'Congress won't do the right thing anyway' is no excuse for not calling on Congress to do the right thing. It certainly won't if there's no pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8216;He answered that in the video; because the last 8 years of Congresses didn&#8217;t have the balls to follow through. Good answer, <span class="caps">BTW</span>&#8217;</p>
	<p>That&#8217;s not exactly what he said. He said Congress has failed to gather evidence. Either way it&#8217;s not a good answer. There&#8217;s enough evidence in public to start impeachment proceedings, in the course of which more evidence would be found. Saying &#8216;Congress won&#8217;t do the right thing anyway&#8217; is no excuse for not calling on Congress to do the right thing. It certainly won&#8217;t if there&#8217;s no pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Clark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661140</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661140</guid>
					<description>&quot;Bob Barr has succeeded in one area that makes me feel inferior. I’m in my 30’s, and I still can’t grow a full mustache.&quot;

..maybe his republicrat 'political strategists' and dundero too have concluded there is some sizable 'mustache demographic' to be pandered to..

...fellow libertarians, let's pray his apparently dundering political advisors don't conclude there is a sizable 'exhibitionist demographic' to be pandered to or barf's bobo might make an appearance at the next whipped cream titty party!    ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Bob Barr has succeeded in one area that makes me feel inferior. I&#8217;m in my 30&#8217;s, and I still can&#8217;t grow a full mustache.&#8221;</p>
	<p>..maybe his republicrat &#8216;political strategists&#8217; and dundero too have concluded there is some sizable &#8216;mustache demographic&#8217; to be pandered to..</p>
	<p>...fellow libertarians, let&#8217;s pray his apparently dundering political advisors don&#8217;t conclude there is a sizable &#8216;exhibitionist demographic&#8217; to be pandered to or barf&#8217;s bobo might make an appearance at the next whipped cream titty party!    ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: td</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661071</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/06/20/why-bob-barr-favors-clinton-bill-over-bush-dubya/#comment-661071</guid>
					<description>Oh, and I meant to add:
Bob Barr has succeeded in one area that makes me feel inferior. I'm in my 30's, and I still can't grow a full mustache. :{)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, and I meant to add:<br />
Bob Barr has succeeded in one area that makes me feel inferior. I&#8217;m in my 30&#8217;s, and I still can&#8217;t grow a full mustache. :{)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
