Comments on: Donation Drive for Chuck Baldwin currently under way

by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home[s]

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:45:59 +0000

Kevin Byers and Cody Quirk:

Red Phillips Says:
July 15th, 2008 at 10:53 pm

“ [If] We can’t have men of the cloth condemning sin…. I’m not exactly sure what Christian preachers are supposed to do if not preach the revealed Word of God,”

Don Lake: May be staying out of SECULAR public affairs and government administration…..

by: Kevin Byers

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:43:42 +0000

Chuck Baldwin was dead on target when he wrote the article following 911. Only a fool could fail to recognize that God rules in the affairs of men. As Ben Franklin belived; a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without the knowledge of God and a nation cannot rise to power without His permission. Chuck Baldwin has my support, money, and vote.

by: Cody Quirk

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:37:24 +0000

However when certain times come, we will have to put aside differences temporarly.

by: Cody Quirk

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:35:23 +0000

I have an appology from Constitution members when they tried to tell me in the beginning that ballot access was easy and Libertarian success was not very impressive.

= Who said that?

BTW Larry, while LP and CP’ers may have a good amount in common, the issues of Abortion, Immigration and especially the economy is going to divide us for good.

by: Howard

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:32:04 +0000

Let’s be honest here, Libertarians and the CP don’t have a chance in this election. But what it comes down to is that both are providing a needed “other choice” to the Dems and the Repubs. Both of those parties are pushing towards a New World order as we all know. More and more people are catching on to this ever so slowly. We should be for each other at this time focusing on exposing the snakes that are our current representatives that aren’t representing us!

by: Larry

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:51:32 +0000

I appologize for all the rude comments Libertarians have made to Constitutional Party members. Now can I have an appology from Constitution members when they tried to tell me in the beginning that ballot access was easy and Libertarian success was not very impressive. After Chuck Baldwin loses big time can I make a friendly suggestion? Constitution members please join the Libertarian Party so we can have an honest debate between the conservatives and the libertines and come up with some resolutions and join together and save this country from Republican and Democratic Socialism. Libertines I do not think you should be put in jail, but could you please be tolerant of me and not do your libertinisms in my face. Thanks. In conclusion we need more of the hard work of the Libertarians at ballot access and more of a combination of voluntary conservative values mixed with freedom. I do not need to be a libertine to believe in freedom. I can choose to be good.

by: Mike

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:19:40 +0000

Im not a Barr supporter, and Im certianly not a Baldwin supporter.

by: Cody Quirk

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:08:03 +0000

Yes he does.

Why does Barr supporters here have to sound like Leftists when attacking Chuck Baldwin?

by: Mike

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:03:58 +0000

I still have yet to figure out how Chuck Baldwin calls himself a Constitutionalist when he doesnt believe in the first ammendment.

by: Glenn Brown

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:03:11 +0000

Money needed for ballot qualification which wasn’t mention in the article.
Other wise Baldwin will not make a less seven states in the next several months.

by: Cody Quirk

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:02:40 +0000

Jason, I’d rather vote for a man with no experience in office then one whose made a career out of it.

Since, it would basically be the same thing as reelecting one that isn’t likely to behaive any different then before.

by: Red Phillips

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:53:36 +0000

“A candidate who says the things Chuck Baldwin said immediately after 9/11 is not getting a vote of mine, much less a single penny from me.”

That’s right Gene, because contrary to the protests of some libertarians, “real” libertarians understand that libertarianism is a moral philosophy as well as a governmental philosophy. We can’t have men of the cloth condemning sin. That would be oh so unlibertarians. I’m not exactly sure what Christian preachers are supposed to do if not preach the revealed Word of God, but no matter. Just as long as the true gospel of libertarianism isn’t challenged by those pesky Christians condemning sin.

by: Jason

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:46:17 +0000

Cody you’re grasping for straws. They are one in the same. You folks elected him to run for POTUS. However, that “sermon” has nothing to do with his immenent and disastrous defeat. It’s because he is a nobody with no accomplishments private or public. He will set back any improvements (assuming there are any) the CP has made. This will by far be the worst attempt for the White House by the CP.

by: Cody Quirk

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:30:23 +0000

That was a sermon, not a statement as a CP representative.

I’m still voting for Chuck, and I’m not a Baptist.

by: Gene Trosper

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:48:04 +0000

A candidate who says the things Chuck Baldwin said immediately after 9/11 is not getting a vote of mine, much less a single penny from me.

http://www.freeliberal.com/blog/archives/003420.php