<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statement from Jim King, AIP Chairman</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-731032</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-731032</guid>
					<description>People like Citizens are a penny a dozen; all they have is rhetoric and misspelled lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>People like Citizens are a penny a dozen; all they have is rhetoric and misspelled lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-731027</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-731027</guid>
					<description>Mr. Breazeale, thank you for reminding me why I am glad to be out of the CP. What good is a platform if your candidates and leaders do not agree with it?

= What good is a political party if a platform must be exclusive enough to keep out 99% of all well-meaning conservatives?

BTW, the issue wasn't about Abortion, it was about finding a excuse to kick out a state affiliate whose members belong to the LDS Church, and then starting a snowball effect that would have purified the CP of its Mormon membership.

Care to dispute me on that? Because I have the evidence to prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. Breazeale, thank you for reminding me why I am glad to be out of the CP. What good is a platform if your candidates and leaders do not agree with it?</p>
	<p>= What good is a political party if a platform must be exclusive enough to keep out 99% of all well-meaning conservatives?</p>
	<p><span class="caps">BTW</span>, the issue wasn&#8217;t about Abortion, it was about finding a excuse to kick out a state affiliate whose members belong to the <span class="caps">LDS </span>Church, and then starting a snowball effect that would have purified the CP of its Mormon membership.</p>
	<p>Care to dispute me on that? Because I have the evidence to prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home[s]</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-724078</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-724078</guid>
					<description>Larry knows stuff 'fer sure' that he has never seen or heard of. He is a Cody Quirk unthinking Stepford CP activist. If his cabal says some thing, then trustingly, he agrees as if it were documented truth! 

When confronted with documented proof he shuts his ears, opens his mouth, and yells snarkies at the top of his lungs. Yer can't be a leader if not many folks follow you! And Middle School students like Quirk and Breazeale are a dime a dozen!  They can be found in droves on any Junior High School play ground!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Larry knows stuff &#8216;fer sure&#8217; that he has never seen or heard of. He is a Cody Quirk unthinking Stepford CP activist. If his cabal says some thing, then trustingly, he agrees as if it were documented truth!</p>
	<p>When confronted with documented proof he shuts his ears, opens his mouth, and yells snarkies at the top of his lungs. Yer can&#8217;t be a leader if not many folks follow you! And Middle School students like Quirk and Breazeale are a dime a dozen!  They can be found in droves on any Junior High School play ground!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RRHeustisJr</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-719664</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-719664</guid>
					<description>Larry Breazele says: &lt;i&gt;He is PRO-LIFE enough for me.&lt;/i&gt;

If Mr. Castle is &quot;pro-life&quot; enough for you, then have at it.  Support him - I'm not stopping you, or criticizing you for supporting him.

I simply stated my opinion as to why I have neither confidence nor enthusiasm in a Baldwin candidacy.  My vote belongs to me, not to Larry Breazele.

If that makes me a &quot;knucklehead,&quot; then so be it.  The name-calling criticism, not to mention the choice of words, is juvenile.

I did not realize that as an independent citizen I was required to toe your line and think exactly as you think in order to be one of the good guys or to have &quot;common sense,&quot; as you claim that you have.

Larry Breazele also says: &lt;i&gt;The platform stands on itself.&lt;/i&gt;

On the contrary, a party's platform can never &quot;stand on itself.&quot;  The document must be enforced.  No document can &quot;stand on itself.&quot;  For example, if the U.S. Constitution is never enforced, then it is foolish to suggest that the Constitution &quot;stands on itself.&quot;  It absolutely &lt;i&gt;must&lt;/i&gt; be enforced if it's going to stand up at all.

The same thing with a party platform.  Simply put, a party's platform is worth absolutely &lt;i&gt;nothing&lt;/i&gt; unless the party's leaders enforce it, especially on principles that must never be compromised, such as the Right to Life.  A soiled sheet of Charmin bathroom tissue is worth more than an unenforced party platform.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charmin.com/en_us/pages/home.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Click here to choose between Ultra Strong or Ultra Soft&lt;/a&gt;....

It is my opinion that the Nevada CP affiliate's supposedly pro-life platform likewise was meaningless when the state party itself regularly elected (and continues to elect) pro-abort party officers, not to mention anything about the pro-abort candidates for office.

These are my opinions, and I am not forcing you to adopt them.

The &quot;hole in my mouth&quot; is free to state my opinions; and if you feel the need to label someone a &quot;knucklehead&quot; for holding to adverse opinions, then I suppose you have the freedom to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Larry Breazele says: <i>He is <span class="caps">PRO</span>-LIFE enough for me.</i></p>
	<p>If Mr. Castle is &#8220;pro-life&#8221; enough for you, then have at it.  Support him &#8211; I&#8217;m not stopping you, or criticizing you for supporting him.</p>
	<p>I simply stated my opinion as to why I have neither confidence nor enthusiasm in a Baldwin candidacy.  My vote belongs to me, not to Larry Breazele.</p>
	<p>If that makes me a &#8220;knucklehead,&#8221; then so be it.  The name-calling criticism, not to mention the choice of words, is juvenile.</p>
	<p>I did not realize that as an independent citizen I was required to toe your line and think exactly as you think in order to be one of the good guys or to have &#8220;common sense,&#8221; as you claim that you have.</p>
	<p>Larry Breazele also says: <i>The platform stands on itself.</i></p>
	<p>On the contrary, a party&#8217;s platform can never &#8220;stand on itself.&#8221;  The document must be enforced.  No document can &#8220;stand on itself.&#8221;  For example, if the U.S. Constitution is never enforced, then it is foolish to suggest that the Constitution &#8220;stands on itself.&#8221;  It absolutely <i>must</i> be enforced if it&#8217;s going to stand up at all.</p>
	<p>The same thing with a party platform.  Simply put, a party&#8217;s platform is worth absolutely <i>nothing</i> unless the party&#8217;s leaders enforce it, especially on principles that must never be compromised, such as the Right to Life.  A soiled sheet of Charmin bathroom tissue is worth more than an unenforced party platform.  <a href="http://www.charmin.com/en_us/pages/home.shtml" rel="nofollow">Click here to choose between Ultra Strong or Ultra Soft</a>....</p>
	<p>It is my opinion that the Nevada CP affiliate&#8217;s supposedly pro-life platform likewise was meaningless when the state party itself regularly elected (and continues to elect) pro-abort party officers, not to mention anything about the pro-abort candidates for office.</p>
	<p>These are my opinions, and I am not forcing you to adopt them.</p>
	<p>The &#8220;hole in my mouth&#8221; is free to state my opinions; and if you feel the need to label someone a &#8220;knucklehead&#8221; for holding to adverse opinions, then I suppose you have the freedom to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-719414</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-719414</guid>
					<description>Mr. Breazeale, thank you for reminding me why I am glad to be out of the CP.  What good is a platform if your candidates and leaders do not agree with it?  It is little more than a PR document and a misleading one at that.  Many of us left the GOP in the first place because we could see with our own eyes that the Republican Party platform was meaningless when her candidates were not required to support the platform.  Your name-calling and screaming do not endear any one to you, but your fellow CP shills.  You make Ed Noonan look calm and reasonable by comparison.  Oh and BTW, being a write-in candidate by its very nature means that a candidate is not on the ballot.  Interesting Orwellian double-think and double-speak you have going on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. Breazeale, thank you for reminding me why I am glad to be out of the CP.  What good is a platform if your candidates and leaders do not agree with it?  It is little more than a PR document and a misleading one at that.  Many of us left the <span class="caps">GOP</span> in the first place because we could see with our own eyes that the Republican Party platform was meaningless when her candidates were not required to support the platform.  Your name-calling and screaming do not endear any one to you, but your fellow CP shills.  You make Ed Noonan look calm and reasonable by comparison.  Oh and <span class="caps">BTW</span>, being a write-in candidate by its very nature means that a candidate is not on the ballot.  Interesting Orwellian double-think and double-speak you have going on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry Breazeale,Msgt.(ret.)USAF</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-717343</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-717343</guid>
					<description>Mr. RRHEUSTIS JR. ....YOU sir are another knucklehead, that does not know what you are talking about. I figure you are one of those ridiculas religion zealot purists that look for a walking saint with no blemishes.

I know Darrell Castle personally. He stands on the issues the very same way I do. He stands by the PLATFORM of our party, which makes big sense to me...&quot;common sense&quot;. He is PRO-LIFE enough for me. What comes out of the hole in your face is pure bunk. Like our founding fathers told their 'misfits'....JOIN OR DIE.  Darrell Castle is a patriot, in every sense of the word. A Vietnam veteran and a wonderful caring man. 
I will STAND UP for any and all in our Constitution party (aka: American Independent Party) every chance I can, whenever ANY knucklehead makes ridiculas comments as you. HEY! I was in favor of standing by faithfully , the Nevada IAP too! THEY WERE NEVER PRO-ABORTION AT ANY TIME. Read the platform knucklehead! The platform stands on itself. Where YOU are so wrapped up in &quot;technicalities&quot;, sweating the small stuff, in the meantime, our republic is going down the drain. YOU have no common sense. 
                                  -Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.)USAF
                                   Nat.Chrm.National Veterans Coalition,
                                   Constitution party...www.nvets.org
                                   Chairman, Orange County Central Committee,
                                   American Independent Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. <span class="caps">RRHEUSTIS JR</span>. ....YOU sir are another knucklehead, that does not know what you are talking about. I figure you are one of those ridiculas religion zealot purists that look for a walking saint with no blemishes.</p>
	<p>I know Darrell Castle personally. He stands on the issues the very same way I do. He stands by the <span class="caps">PLATFORM</span> of our party, which makes big sense to me&#8230;&#8221;common sense&#8221;. He is <span class="caps">PRO</span>-LIFE enough for me. What comes out of the hole in your face is pure bunk. Like our founding fathers told their &#8216;misfits&#8217;....JOIN <span class="caps">OR DIE</span>.  Darrell Castle is a patriot, in every sense of the word. A Vietnam veteran and a wonderful caring man.<br />
I will <span class="caps">STAND UP</span> for any and all in our Constitution party (aka: American Independent Party) every chance I can, whenever <span class="caps">ANY</span> knucklehead makes ridiculas comments as you. <span class="caps">HEY</span>! I was in favor of standing by faithfully , the Nevada <span class="caps">IAP</span> too! <span class="caps">THEY WERE NEVER PRO</span>-ABORTION <span class="caps">AT ANY TIME</span>. Read the platform knucklehead! The platform stands on itself. Where <span class="caps">YOU</span> are so wrapped up in &#8220;technicalities&#8221;, sweating the small stuff, in the meantime, our republic is going down the drain. <span class="caps">YOU</span> have no common sense.</p>
	<p>                                  -Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.)USAF<br />
                                   Nat.Chrm.National Veterans Coalition,<br />
                                   Constitution party&#8230;www.nvets.org<br />
                                   Chairman, Orange County Central Committee,<br />
                                   American Independent Party
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RRHeustisJr</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-714678</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-714678</guid>
					<description>CPNC Chair says:
&lt;i&gt;Reed Huestis (sic) -going to vote for Baldwin after all??&lt;/i&gt;

I never said I was, but I never said I wasn't either.

I can say this though:  Baldwin's selection of Darell Castle as Veep destroyed any enthusiasm I might have had for a Baldwin Presidency. 

Mr. Castle's vote in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christianconstitutionalist.com/articles/20060429.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tampa&lt;/a&gt; in 2006 for continued affiliation with the pro-abort Nevada affiliate, renders Castle totally ineligible to be a legitimate pro-life champion, in my humble opinion.

Whenever I vote for President, I want absolute confidence that my candidate will not compromise on the Life issue by appointing pro-aborts to his Administration and tolerating those who endorse baby-murder.  Mr. Baldwin's selection of Castle does not give me any confidence whatsoever in a Baldwin Administration.

Therefore, I cannot endorse Baldwin's candidacy at this time.

It may not matter for me anyway, in California at least.  Unless the Courts overturn the SOS's decision to place Alan Keyes on the ballot, I would be unable to cast a vote for Baldwin, even if I wanted to, unless it was as a meaningless write-in vote.

Nevertheless, my main purpose for showing up at the polls this Autumn is to cast a vote in favor of the California Marriage Protection Act, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.protectmarriage.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proposition 8&lt;/a&gt;, a desperately needed California Constitutional amendment that would define marriage as being only between one man and one woman.

Only 50 percent of the vote is needed for the Amendment to pass.  I intend to be among that percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">CPNC </span>Chair says:<br />
<i>Reed Huestis (sic) -going to vote for Baldwin after all??</i></p>
	<p>I never said I was, but I never said I wasn&#8217;t either.</p>
	<p>I can say this though:  Baldwin&#8217;s selection of Darell Castle as Veep destroyed any enthusiasm I might have had for a Baldwin Presidency.</p>
	<p>Mr. Castle&#8217;s vote in <a href="http://www.christianconstitutionalist.com/articles/20060429.htm" rel="nofollow">Tampa</a> in 2006 for continued affiliation with the pro-abort Nevada affiliate, renders Castle totally ineligible to be a legitimate pro-life champion, in my humble opinion.</p>
	<p>Whenever I vote for President, I want absolute confidence that my candidate will not compromise on the Life issue by appointing pro-aborts to his Administration and tolerating those who endorse baby-murder.  Mr. Baldwin&#8217;s selection of Castle does not give me any confidence whatsoever in a Baldwin Administration.</p>
	<p>Therefore, I cannot endorse Baldwin&#8217;s candidacy at this time.</p>
	<p>It may not matter for me anyway, in California at least.  Unless the Courts overturn the <span class="caps">SOS</span>&#8217;s decision to place Alan Keyes on the ballot, I would be unable to cast a vote for Baldwin, even if I wanted to, unless it was as a meaningless write-in vote.</p>
	<p>Nevertheless, my main purpose for showing up at the polls this Autumn is to cast a vote in favor of the California Marriage Protection Act, <a href="http://www.protectmarriage.com/" rel="nofollow">Proposition 8</a>, a desperately needed California Constitutional amendment that would define marriage as being only between one man and one woman.</p>
	<p>Only 50 percent of the vote is needed for the Amendment to pass.  I intend to be among that percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry Breazeale,Msgt.(ret.)USAF</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-714226</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-714226</guid>
					<description>I also say to &quot;Doc Grundmann&quot;....well said and accurately stated by a man of honor and integrity...as well! God Bless You Doc! -Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.) USAF, Nat.Chrm. NVC/CP...www.nvets.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I also say to &#8220;Doc Grundmann&#8221;....well said and accurately stated by a man of honor and integrity&#8230;as well! God Bless You Doc! -Larry Breazeale, Msgt.(ret.) <span class="caps">USAF</span>, Nat.Chrm. <span class="caps">NVC</span>/CP&#8230;www.nvets.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gary Odom</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-713243</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-713243</guid>
					<description>Bravo, Don Grundmann!  

Well said and accurately stated by a man of honor and integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bravo, Don Grundmann!</p>
	<p>Well said and accurately stated by a man of honor and integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711573</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711573</guid>
					<description>BTW Joe, I addressed Ed Noonan and the Elections Code in a previous article here, why don't you read it and check out the Cali. Elections Codes before you open your mouth.

And Ed Noonan claimed that the CP has never elected anybody to office, which is outright bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">BTW </span>Joe, I addressed Ed Noonan and the Elections Code in a previous article here, why don&#8217;t you read it and check out the Cali. Elections Codes before you open your mouth.</p>
	<p>And Ed Noonan claimed that the CP has never elected anybody to office, which is outright bull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711567</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711567</guid>
					<description>I think this is the same 'Joe' from New York that bashed the CP over keeping a state affiliate lead by Mormons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think this is the same &#8216;Joe&#8217; from New York that bashed the CP over keeping a state affiliate lead by Mormons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don Grundmann</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711536</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711536</guid>
					<description>&quot; VALEDICTION Says: 

July 23rd, 2008 at 6:24 pm 
I’m sorry, but like it or not, it seems like Mr. Noonan has done his homework on this issue, and that Mr. King and his spin-doctors have not.

After the AIP dumped Baldwin, Mr. King and his spin-doctors told us to ignore all of this, insisting that Mr. Noonan had his facts wrong.

Then after the AIP website affirmed the legitimacy of Mr. Noonan’s position, Mr. King and his spin-doctors told us to ignore that website, insisting that even the website had its facts wrong.

And now that the Secretary of State has weighed in on the matter, and has likewise affirmed the legitimacy of Mr. Noonan’s position, Mr. King and his spin-doctors would now have us believe that the Secretary of State also has her facts wrong, somehow.

Now, supposing that Mr. King is even capable of taking such a trivial matter to court, it seems to me that this whole “controversy” has already lost all of its credibility, despite all of the complaints that have been voiced over and over again on this website (and always by the same three people, mind you).

Meanwhile, I must say, kudos to Mr. Noonan for having a good head on his shoulders, and for having had the courage to introduce a new possibility for conservatives in California.&quot;

Response : As the Vice-Chairman of the REAL AIP, whose Chairman is Jim King, I can state the following :

1) The by-laws of the AIP allow a majority of the central committee to call a convention and this was done resulting in the Los Angeles convention of 6-28 &amp;#38; 29.  This convention and the resulting election of officers, including myself, was completely legal and in compliance with AIP by-laws, the Election Code, and Roberts Rules of Order as was confirmed by a professional parlimentarian that we hired to monitor our convention to ensure that we would be in compliance with all Codes and by-laws.   Ed Noonan and his fellow liars and traitors planned a subsequent &quot; convention &quot; on 7-4 &amp;#38; 5 in Sacramento because he planned on unilaterally declaring that anyone voting against his side was ineligible to vote.  He would hence stack the deck and declare that his faction of liars won.  In Los Angeles we would have allowed any of the rats to attend and vote as we had our professional parlimentarian to ensure fairness but Ed knew that unless he controlled the vote he would lose.  Hence he could only have his fake &quot; convention &quot; in Sacramento where the plan was to disqualify his opponents from voting by having the liar Mark Robinson act as &quot; Parlimentarian &quot; to control the vote and support Eds' untilateral declarations in stopping voting by his opponents.   

2) Keyes told Ed early on that he would stack the convention with 500 of his supporters in order to steal the AIP away from the CP and into Keyes fake party.  The attendance at the fake Sacramento &quot; convention &quot; was 19 including our spies.  The attendance in Los Angeles was 45.  The fake &quot; convention &quot; in Sacramento added proxies to bring their number to 47.  Our professional parlimentarian advised us that the Election Code and AIP by-laws did not allow for the use of proxies so they were hence not allowed in Los Angeles but were allowed at the liars &quot; convention &quot; in Sacramento.    

3) The liars, especially Mark Robinson, claim that the Los Angeles convention virtually dragged people in off the street to find delegates.  This complete and total lie ( standard procedure for Mark Robinson ) is their stupid and cheap attempt ( one of many ) to belittle the Los Angeles convention.  Our professional parlimentarian will certify that all of our actions were completely legal and in compliance with all laws.  Our delegates were completely legal and long established members of the party.

4) On Friday 6-27 the Noonan rats had a online/phone &quot; convention &quot; ( totally against both the Election Code and AIP by-laws ) where they disaffiliated from the CP and joined Keyes fake/rat party.  Only Noonan supporters ( all 5 of them including Ed ) were notified and no other central committee members were informed.  After this &quot; convention &quot; they filed a disaffiliation document with the Secretary of States' office.  A totally fake document produced by a completely illegal &quot; convention &quot; as a cheap stunt to file papers first as they knew that the legal Los Angeles convention would reaffiliate with the CP.  

5) Mr. Noonan does not &quot; have a good head on his shoulders.&quot;  He is, as with his fellow Judases of Mark Robinson and Mark Seidenberg, a outright liar.  They are all political rapists who work to hold the Constitution Party down so that Alan Keyes can rape it.  They are destroyers and can never build anything.  That is why they are relying on court corruption to achieve what they could never otherwise do.  Ed Noonan is a betrayer and backstabber of the highest ( lowest ) order as Bill Schear chose him to protect and continue the party with the CP.  Instead he has betrayed Bill Schear and put a knife in his back.  Ed Noonan is, hands-down with no possible other competition, the worst Chairman ever of the AIP and probably of any political party in the history of the nation.  If Bill Schear were still alive he would beat Ed Noonan to death with his cane for his sickening betrayal.  People who know the facts know that Ed Noonan, Mark Robinson, and Mark Seidenberg are liars, rats, and traitors.  They will be defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8221; <span class="caps">VALEDICTION </span>Says:</p>
	<p>July 23rd, 2008 at 6:24 pm<br />
I&#8217;m sorry, but like it or not, it seems like Mr. Noonan has done his homework on this issue, and that Mr. King and his spin-doctors have not.</p>
	<p>After the <span class="caps">AIP</span> dumped Baldwin, Mr. King and his spin-doctors told us to ignore all of this, insisting that Mr. Noonan had his facts wrong.</p>
	<p>Then after the <span class="caps">AIP</span> website affirmed the legitimacy of Mr. Noonan&#8217;s position, Mr. King and his spin-doctors told us to ignore that website, insisting that even the website had its facts wrong.</p>
	<p>And now that the Secretary of State has weighed in on the matter, and has likewise affirmed the legitimacy of Mr. Noonan&#8217;s position, Mr. King and his spin-doctors would now have us believe that the Secretary of State also has her facts wrong, somehow.</p>
	<p>Now, supposing that Mr. King is even capable of taking such a trivial matter to court, it seems to me that this whole &#8220;controversy&#8221; has already lost all of its credibility, despite all of the complaints that have been voiced over and over again on this website (and always by the same three people, mind you).</p>
	<p>Meanwhile, I must say, kudos to Mr. Noonan for having a good head on his shoulders, and for having had the courage to introduce a new possibility for conservatives in California.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Response : As the Vice-Chairman of the <span class="caps">REAL AIP</span>, whose Chairman is Jim King, I can state the following :</p>
	<p>1) The by-laws of the <span class="caps">AIP</span> allow a majority of the central committee to call a convention and this was done resulting in the Los Angeles convention of 6-28 &#038; 29.  This convention and the resulting election of officers, including myself, was completely legal and in compliance with <span class="caps">AIP</span> by-laws, the Election Code, and Roberts Rules of Order as was confirmed by a professional parlimentarian that we hired to monitor our convention to ensure that we would be in compliance with all Codes and by-laws.   Ed Noonan and his fellow liars and traitors planned a subsequent &#8221; convention &#8221; on 7-4 &#038; 5 in Sacramento because he planned on unilaterally declaring that anyone voting against his side was ineligible to vote.  He would hence stack the deck and declare that his faction of liars won.  In Los Angeles we would have allowed any of the rats to attend and vote as we had our professional parlimentarian to ensure fairness but Ed knew that unless he controlled the vote he would lose.  Hence he could only have his fake &#8221; convention &#8221; in Sacramento where the plan was to disqualify his opponents from voting by having the liar Mark Robinson act as &#8221; Parlimentarian &#8221; to control the vote and support Eds&#8217; untilateral declarations in stopping voting by his opponents.</p>
	<p>2) Keyes told Ed early on that he would stack the convention with 500 of his supporters in order to steal the <span class="caps">AIP</span> away from the CP and into Keyes fake party.  The attendance at the fake Sacramento &#8221; convention &#8221; was 19 including our spies.  The attendance in Los Angeles was 45.  The fake &#8221; convention &#8221; in Sacramento added proxies to bring their number to 47.  Our professional parlimentarian advised us that the Election Code and <span class="caps">AIP</span> by-laws did not allow for the use of proxies so they were hence not allowed in Los Angeles but were allowed at the liars &#8221; convention &#8221; in Sacramento.</p>
	<p>3) The liars, especially Mark Robinson, claim that the Los Angeles convention virtually dragged people in off the street to find delegates.  This complete and total lie ( standard procedure for Mark Robinson ) is their stupid and cheap attempt ( one of many ) to belittle the Los Angeles convention.  Our professional parlimentarian will certify that all of our actions were completely legal and in compliance with all laws.  Our delegates were completely legal and long established members of the party.</p>
	<p>4) On Friday 6-27 the Noonan rats had a online/phone &#8221; convention &#8221; ( totally against both the Election Code and <span class="caps">AIP</span> by-laws ) where they disaffiliated from the CP and joined Keyes fake/rat party.  Only Noonan supporters ( all 5 of them including Ed ) were notified and no other central committee members were informed.  After this &#8221; convention &#8221; they filed a disaffiliation document with the Secretary of States&#8217; office.  A totally fake document produced by a completely illegal &#8221; convention &#8221; as a cheap stunt to file papers first as they knew that the legal Los Angeles convention would reaffiliate with the CP.</p>
	<p>5) Mr. Noonan does not &#8221; have a good head on his shoulders.&#8221;  He is, as with his fellow Judases of Mark Robinson and Mark Seidenberg, a outright liar.  They are all political rapists who work to hold the Constitution Party down so that Alan Keyes can rape it.  They are destroyers and can never build anything.  That is why they are relying on court corruption to achieve what they could never otherwise do.  Ed Noonan is a betrayer and backstabber of the highest ( lowest ) order as Bill Schear chose him to protect and continue the party with the CP.  Instead he has betrayed Bill Schear and put a knife in his back.  Ed Noonan is, hands-down with no possible other competition, the worst Chairman ever of the <span class="caps">AIP</span> and probably of any political party in the history of the nation.  If Bill Schear were still alive he would beat Ed Noonan to death with his cane for his sickening betrayal.  People who know the facts know that Ed Noonan, Mark Robinson, and Mark Seidenberg are liars, rats, and traitors.  They will be defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711508</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711508</guid>
					<description>&quot;and for having had the courage to introduce a new possibility for conservatives in California.&quot;

Yeah, now &quot;conservatives&quot; can vote for neocon interventionist McAmnesty or neocon interventionist Keyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;and for having had the courage to introduce a new possibility for conservatives in California.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Yeah, now &#8220;conservatives&#8221; can vote for neocon interventionist McAmnesty or neocon interventionist Keyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711175</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711175</guid>
					<description>Larry, the Constitution Party never has been nor never will be the third largest political party in these united States of America.  They are a distant fifth.  The only question is whether the Greens are bigger than the Libertarians.  IMOHO, I would have to say that the Libertarian Party is larger than the Green Party, but I am biased since I have many more friends in the Libertarian Party than the GP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Larry, the Constitution Party never has been nor never will be the third largest political party in these united States of America.  They are a distant fifth.  The only question is whether the Greens are bigger than the Libertarians.  <span class="caps">IMOHO</span>, I would have to say that the Libertarian Party is larger than the Green Party, but I am biased since I have many more friends in the Libertarian Party than the GP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711126</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/07/22/statement-from-jim-king-aip-chairman/#comment-711126</guid>
					<description>Constitution Party people tried to get me to switch from Libertarian Party. They kept saying they were bigger. I checked out the facts. They were and are taking several parties, adding them up and calling that a party. Well a little dishonest if you ask me. I am staying Libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Constitution Party people tried to get me to switch from Libertarian Party. They kept saying they were bigger. I checked out the facts. They were and are taking several parties, adding them up and calling that a party. Well a little dishonest if you ask me. I am staying Libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
