Comments on: Nader: Why can’t I testify on Bush/Cheney impeachment?

by: kasino spiel im internet

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:08:50 +0000

nice site indeed

by: cyber cazino

Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:08:17 +0000

Hello. May I rent your layout for my site?

by: MPM

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:09:56 +0000

Thank you Dems to Win!

Barr got to testify because of his experience in Congress and with the impeachment of Clinton. Also he got a nod from committee member Mel Watt during the hearing so it might have to do with a connection there. Finally Barr actually understands and cares about the Constitution and has demonstrated so through his actions, unlike Nader.

by: Dems to Win

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:21:36 +0000

Nader is a pathetic whiner. He’s the one who said “there’s no difference between Bush and Gore”. So why in the world would anyone consider him a public policy ‘expert’ after he spouted such nonsense?

Bob Barr is a former congressman—he has actually held public office! Something Nader has not even come close to achieving. Of course Conyers gives some deference to a former member of the House.

by: Shiu Hung

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:48:00 +0000

We need to take immediate and aggressive court action regarding the PA Bonusgate Scandal, and examine similar corruption in other states. How can voters be assured this criminal action won’t happen during this/other Presidential elections? It is time to change the draconian ballot access laws that are biased and anti-democratic, and designed by Democrats and Republicans to jeopardize independent, third party candidates from being able to get on the ballots. There is also evidence of massive fraud by GOP operatives in the Ohio 2004 election, with possible Karl Rove involvement. All of these criminal acts need to be fully exposed, and justice sought. On July 25, there will be impeachment hearings, and Ralph Nader needs to be present to add his voice. Explain why Libertarian candidate Bob Barr has been invited, and not Ralph Nader? It is not acceptable. This is clearly a double standard that we will not abide. It appears that the Chairman is playing politics by disinviting Mr. Nader to these hearings, and not all that interested in probing for the truth. Mr. Nader must attend.

by: Tennessee Mike

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000

Whay a joke – yes, let’s spend $100 million to impeach Bush, by that time, his term will be over!

I swear, these left-wing dumbasses sure don’t understand the value of a $, maybe because they haven’t earned much of their own – how does Nader make a living, anyway?

by: Michelle

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:31:41 +0000

This is totally unfair, and anti-democratic. Mr. Nader has been a champion of American freedoms for forty years, and has been at the forfront in seeking impeachment proceedings for years. The fact that he has been excluded is an act of suppression, and this is not an isolated incident. Since he announced his Presidential candidacy there has been a virtual media blackout, (both mainstream and “alternative”) with very few exceptions. In fact, the recent Bonusgate Scandal in PA has proven that Mr.Nader was intentionally kept off the ballots in PA (and elsewhere, no doubt) by the Democratic Party using taxpayer funds, and was illegally and wrongfully sued. Mr. Nader deserves to have a place at the table during these impeachment hearings, and must not be prevented from doing so. Why is Libertarian candidate Bob Barr invited, and Not Mr. nader? What double standards and hypocracy. We want real representation through Mr. Nader & Dennis Kucinich.