<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A place on the ballot in Massachusetts</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brandon Magoon</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-783118</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-783118</guid>
					<description>Two observations:

Baldwin won't be on the ballot in Texas so that pretty much rules out any chance that Ron Paul will endorse him.

So Clinton will be on the Ballot in Massachusetts? She did win the primary. Because if she isn't then on what basis is Massachusetts denying substitution? Seem like a point that should be made when this goes to court.

Please note I'm not a hard core Barr supporter as he hasn't made his case yet. These are just observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Two observations:</p>
	<p>Baldwin won&#8217;t be on the ballot in Texas so that pretty much rules out any chance that Ron Paul will endorse him.</p>
	<p>So Clinton will be on the Ballot in Massachusetts? She did win the primary. Because if she isn&#8217;t then on what basis is Massachusetts denying substitution? Seem like a point that should be made when this goes to court.</p>
	<p>Please note I&#8217;m not a hard core Barr supporter as he hasn&#8217;t made his case yet. These are just observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DIAMOND</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-780517</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-780517</guid>
					<description>Congratulation Phillies you got what you wanted, you did it again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Congratulation Phillies you got what you wanted, you did it again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-780351</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/15/a-place-on-the-ballot-in-massachusetts/#comment-780351</guid>
					<description>You know whats funny? Just like in West Virginia, Baldwin may be on the ballot in Mass. and Barr will not.

Mass. has grown a strong CP presence lately, and they started petitioning early too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know whats funny? Just like in West Virginia, Baldwin may be on the ballot in Mass. and Barr will not.</p>
	<p>Mass. has grown a strong CP presence lately, and they started petitioning early too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
