<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The latest on Bloomberg-Paul</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Impeach Bush</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-812314</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-812314</guid>
					<description>Hey Lowell, as much as we have disagreed on certian issues, I still think you should not stay home election day, and stand up for your beliefs. Even if there isn't a single candidate you can vote for, you should at least do a write in of &quot;None of the above&quot; or something along the lines of it. As pointless as it may sound, you are still taking a stand. In doing that, you are showing you care and are there to participate, but you can't agree with any of the above candidates. Consider it. Don't let any politician make your voice unheard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Lowell, as much as we have disagreed on certian issues, I still think you should not stay home election day, and stand up for your beliefs. Even if there isn&#8217;t a single candidate you can vote for, you should at least do a write in of &#8220;None of the above&#8221; or something along the lines of it. As pointless as it may sound, you are still taking a stand. In doing that, you are showing you care and are there to participate, but you can&#8217;t agree with any of the above candidates. Consider it. Don&#8217;t let any politician make your voice unheard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-799049</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-799049</guid>
					<description>Hi Clark,

&quot;LOWELL, what great thought$ have you and st thomas conjured as to ‘the money thing?’..&quot;

I know its exciting to be this close and actually have a chance to ask me a question, Clark. But we really must insist that you make your questions clear. I'm simply too good-looking to deal with something like &quot;the money thing&quot; without knowing what you mean by &quot;the money thing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi Clark,</p>
	<p>&#8220;LOWELL, what great thought$ have you and st thomas conjured as to &#8216;the money thing?&#8217;..&#8221;</p>
	<p>I know its exciting to be this close and actually have a chance to ask me a question, Clark. But we really must insist that you make your questions clear. I&#8217;m simply too good-looking to deal with something like &#8220;the money thing&#8221; without knowing what you mean by &#8220;the money thing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798909</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798909</guid>
					<description>Stefan,

Well, I don't support baby kllers or suspected baby killers so that eliminates Nader, Obama, McCain, and Barr.  I also am not likely to support a candidate that finds a conspiracy of &quot;dark spiritual forces&quot; at work in internal relations. So I guess that leaves me at home on election day guiltless and happy with myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Stefan,</p>
	<p>Well, I don&#8217;t support baby kllers or suspected baby killers so that eliminates Nader, Obama, McCain, and Barr.  I also am not likely to support a candidate that finds a conspiracy of &#8220;dark spiritual forces&#8221; at work in internal relations. So I guess that leaves me at home on election day guiltless and happy with myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Clark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798689</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798689</guid>
					<description>ANDY CRAIG WRITES: &quot;..fringe lefties (Greens, Nader), fringe righties (Baldwin), libertarians, and centrist independents (Bloomberg) really have little in common...&quot; (END) 

...oh, how miserably wrong/naive you are, Andy!..

...one FUCKING HUGE commonality amongst the people in the groups you mention is their ALMOST UNIVERSAL ignorance/brainwashedness of even the basic$ of 'our' stinking fraudulent 'money system'...&quot;money creation,&quot; &quot;issuance,&quot; etc..

...(the goddamned republicrat fools worketh their cheesecake chutes about and lust for illion$ absent one honest clue as to the origin, nature, etc., of even one!)  

LOWELL, what great thought$ have you and st thomas conjured as to 'the money thing?'..

...you have been $trangely $ilent here!..(btw, methinks that's a smart move, lowell!)  ;o)

...but have a beautiful day anyway!..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">ANDY CRAIG WRITES</span>: &#8220;..fringe lefties (Greens, Nader), fringe righties (Baldwin), libertarians, and centrist independents (Bloomberg) really have little in common&#8230;&#8221; (END)</p>
	<p>...oh, how miserably wrong/naive you are, Andy!..</p>
	<p>...one <span class="caps">FUCKING HUGE</span> commonality amongst the people in the groups you mention is their <span class="caps">ALMOST UNIVERSAL</span> ignorance/brainwashedness of even the basic$ of &#8216;our&#8217; stinking fraudulent &#8216;money system&#8217;...&#8221;money creation,&#8221; &#8220;issuance,&#8221; etc..</p>
	<p>...(the goddamned republicrat fools worketh their cheesecake chutes about and lust for illion$ absent one honest clue as to the origin, nature, etc., of even one!)</p>
	<p><span class="caps">LOWELL</span>, what great thought$ have you and st thomas conjured as to &#8216;the money thing?&#8217;..</p>
	<p>...you have been $trangely $ilent here!..(btw, methinks that&#8217;s a smart move, lowell!)  ;o)</p>
	<p>...but have a beautiful day anyway!..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798127</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-798127</guid>
					<description>wow the constitution party? those folks in the indy greens are not only stupid, but i guess also open to fascism and homophobia

Fascisim is big government and imperialism, I recall that the CP does not advocate either.

And on Theocracy:


The Constitution of these United States provides that &quot;no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.&quot; The Constitution Party supports the original intent of this language. Therefore, the Constitution Party calls on all those who love liberty and value their inherent rights to join with us in the pursuit of these goals and in the restoration of these founding principles.&quot;

I guess the early US was Theocratic then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>wow the constitution party? those folks in the indy greens are not only stupid, but i guess also open to fascism and homophobia</p>
	<p>Fascisim is big government and imperialism, I recall that the CP does not advocate either.</p>
	<p>And on Theocracy:</p>
	<p>The Constitution of these United States provides that &#8220;no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.&#8221; The Constitution Party supports the original intent of this language. Therefore, the Constitution Party calls on all those who love liberty and value their inherent rights to join with us in the pursuit of these goals and in the restoration of these founding principles.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I guess the early US was Theocratic then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797705</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797705</guid>
					<description>If people signed petitions under false pretenses, then that's fraud, pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If people signed petitions under false pretenses, then that&#8217;s fraud, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797316</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797316</guid>
					<description>Jonathan: good nolanchart article, gave you thumbs up :-)  As to Baldwin, he is NOT a theocrat, unlike Huckabee, who propose Amendments to the COnstitution to make it the 10 Commandments. (Ron Paul was very correct when he mentioned Sinclair Lewis in response to Huckabee's &quot;Cross&quot; Christmas add and his support of the war and big govt. -indeed a type of corporate fascism). The issue that Baldwin was and is a preacher lead some to think this of him, but it is not the case. He has taken views that differ from others in the RR in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jonathan: good nolanchart article, gave you thumbs up <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   As to Baldwin, he is <span class="caps">NOT</span> a theocrat, unlike Huckabee, who propose Amendments to the COnstitution to make it the 10 Commandments. (Ron Paul was very correct when he mentioned Sinclair Lewis in response to Huckabee&#8217;s &#8220;Cross&#8221; Christmas add and his support of the war and big govt. -indeed a type of corporate fascism). The issue that Baldwin was and is a preacher lead some to think this of him, but it is not the case. He has taken views that differ from others in the RR in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797286</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-797286</guid>
					<description>John L: wow you are positive. I wonder who are you supporting. I already know some who you are not supporting: Paul, Barr &amp;#38; Baldwin and most probably pro-choice Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John L: wow you are positive. I wonder who are you supporting. I already know some who you are not supporting: Paul, Barr &#038; Baldwin and most probably pro-choice Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796950</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796950</guid>
					<description>Jonathan,

Yes, Jonathan, what about the abortion check? Barr's campaign gripes about rough treatment in Maine and Pennsylvania when Republicans there try to keep him off the ballot, yet when this question comes up on their own blog, they censor it. Attracting lots of pro-life voters, are you? Hadn't noticed. Barr's campaign is going into the tank and deservedly. Doubt if you'll poll 1% when all is said and done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jonathan,</p>
	<p>Yes, Jonathan, what about the abortion check? Barr&#8217;s campaign gripes about rough treatment in Maine and Pennsylvania when Republicans there try to keep him off the ballot, yet when this question comes up on their own blog, they censor it. Attracting lots of pro-life voters, are you? Hadn&#8217;t noticed. Barr&#8217;s campaign is going into the tank and deservedly. Doubt if you&#8217;ll poll 1% when all is said and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Craig</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796781</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796781</guid>
					<description>We all should have petitioned to put Ron Paul on the ballot in every state.  Obama or McCain sounds worse every day, and none of the third party challengers is showing any signs of gaining traction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We all should have petitioned to put Ron Paul on the ballot in every state.  Obama or McCain sounds worse every day, and none of the third party challengers is showing any signs of gaining traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jones '08</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796778</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796778</guid>
					<description>Oh well. We can still get Star Jones on the Louisiana ballot if nine people were willing to serve as electors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh well. We can still get Star Jones on the Louisiana ballot if nine people were willing to serve as electors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796154</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796154</guid>
					<description>we have raised so far 129K in August 
The goal is 201K by Aug 24

3 more days to raise $72,000

We need everyone to email and blogg for help.
I know we can do it.

We are on 40 ballots now and need your help !!!
There are 75 days left until election.

Every day is precious, every email is precious.

Let Freedom Grow !
www.bobbarr2008.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>we have raised so far 129K in August<br />
The goal is 201K by Aug 24</p>
	<p>3 more days to raise $72,000</p>
	<p>We need everyone to email and blogg for help.<br />
I know we can do it.</p>
	<p>We are on 40 ballots now and need your help <img src="!" alt="" border="0" /><br />
There are 75 days left until election.</p>
	<p>Every day is precious, every email is precious.</p>
	<p>Let Freedom Grow !<br />
<a href='http://www.bobbarr2008.com' rel='nofollow'>www.bobbarr2008.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796124</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796124</guid>
					<description>Even if the Independent Green Party of Virginia did put Bloomberg on the ballot (and they aren't), he wouldn't get many votes.  In 1952 the Christian Nationalist Party put General Douglas MacArthur on the ballot in 7 states.  He was passive and let them do it, but wasn't a candidate.  He got a tiny vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Even if the Independent Green Party of Virginia did put Bloomberg on the ballot (and they aren&#8217;t), he wouldn&#8217;t get many votes.  In 1952 the Christian Nationalist Party put General Douglas MacArthur on the ballot in 7 states.  He was passive and let them do it, but wasn&#8217;t a candidate.  He got a tiny vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796083</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796083</guid>
					<description>what about the abortion check? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>what about the abortion check? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796073</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/08/21/the-latest-on-bloomberg-paul/#comment-796073</guid>
					<description>Will

&quot;... but i guess also open to ..... homophobia&quot;

Now. Will, is it really a fear of homosexuality that you're identifying here or it is more just an expression of a common sense ability to distinguish between health and disorder? Would you think it odd if someone were not put off by the outward signs of, say, compulsive drunkenness? I mean you can't normalize abberances by stigmatizing those that rightly call them abberences, you know, even though there would very clearly seem to be a concerted effort to do just that among homosexuals and lesbians today. At core, a campaign of this kind - and I call it a campaign because it is one - is simply a fools errant born of a kind of adolescent petulance. Some of us think, it would seem, that we can undo at will those things that are presented to us as given. Might we call that naturophobia, perhaps? Are you a naturophobe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Will</p>
	<p>&#8220;... but i guess also open to &#8230;.. homophobia&#8221;</p>
	<p>Now. Will, is it really a fear of homosexuality that you&#8217;re identifying here or it is more just an expression of a common sense ability to distinguish between health and disorder? Would you think it odd if someone were not put off by the outward signs of, say, compulsive drunkenness? I mean you can&#8217;t normalize abberances by stigmatizing those that rightly call them abberences, you know, even though there would very clearly seem to be a concerted effort to do just that among homosexuals and lesbians today. At core, a campaign of this kind &#8211; and I call it a campaign because it is one &#8211; is simply a fools errant born of a kind of adolescent petulance. Some of us think, it would seem, that we can undo at will those things that are presented to us as given. Might we call that naturophobia, perhaps? Are you a naturophobe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
