Silence.

So, are you and the others disappointed in Ron Paul endorsing Chuck Baldwin over Alan Keyes?

BTW, be sure to inform Ed Noonan about this-

http://mormonsforbaldwin.wordpress.com

Ed Claimed that Chuck was anti-Mormon, yet here is this LDS group supporting Baldwin and even have videos on their website of Baldwin saying nice things about Mormons.

I don’t understand Ed’s logic here.

You are correct, I guess the AIP lost its lead in that district in Alpine County.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ror/60day_presgen_08/supervisorial.xls

No, you don’t.

We also have a elected office holder in Eureka too.

BTW, unless you want to work things out with Jim King & company, don’t call me.

Is it news to you that at one of the five supervisorial districts in Alpine County has more AIP voters than Republican voters.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party

= According to your interpretation.

I believe
your questions on the America’s Independent Party should be directed
the office in Fenton, MI.

= Didn’t you attend their ‘national convention’? I thought you would know.

Restate your question about Nevada.

One thing’s for sure, we’re in better shape then you and larger (pecentage wise).

Did you know that 6.3% of all registered voters in Eureka County are IAP?

The event in Reno on May 2 & 3 convinced me the best time period for
a convention was the 4th of July weekend, because of IAP small turnout
in Reno.

Cody, you are wrong when you say the California Election Codes are not
100 % clear. The parts of the Code I have read were very clear. I believe
your questions on the America’s Independent Party should be directed
the office in Fenton, MI.

Does the Independent American Party of Nev

They also would use the current infighting against you and Markham too.

= Sorry, I meant early June (2008), I was talking about the one that was going to be held at the Dennys.

You have to remember Mark, that the Cali. Elections Codes are not 100% clear on certain guidelines. Only some portions of the Codes were updated and some portions were not, putting your arguments on shaky ground.

And who is the National Chair of the A(i)P? How many state affiliates do you have up and running besides Kentucky?

BTW, can you explain to me how that state committee meeting which which the committee ‘unanimously disaffiated from the CP was legal?

I now think I understand your confussion about the elections of officers and the convention on the AIP on July 5, 2008.

You do not understand what the term “perminent officers” mean under the
California Election Code. It relates to the holding of office for one day only
during the one day long convention. I was the holder of the “perminent
officer” of Chairman having been elected to such by the delegates to the
AIP Convention of 2008. Do not feel to bad about this. You were not
alone, because Don Grundmann, Ann E. Thomas, and the Brewtown lawyer
of Jim King made the same error in there posting on TPW or in the pleadings of King v. Bowen.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party

If your concern was the American Independent Party Convention of 2008
it was never canceled. That convention was in fact held on July 5, 2008 and I was the elected chairman of that convention.

If your concern was the convention of 2006, it is news to me that a July
convention in 2006 was ever called. Nancy would be the person to ask
that question of. She did not bring up the date and location of the convention place of designation at the Los Angeles AIP State Central
Committee meeting. She did not even tell the SCC that we had no current
vice chairman, even though Joseph Bannister gave her a letter of resignation effective at 12:00 midnight on December 31- January 1.

The bottom line by the time the “convention of ‘06” came around on September 2, 2006, Nancy was no longer the Chairman of AIP nor was
she a delegate to the “convention of ‘06”, because of her term limit of two
years had passed.

If it was not the 2006 convention that you concerned about then it most
be the events of 2002 and that is way before my time in the party. However, Jim King or Reed Heustis would be the best persons to ask as
to why the state by-laws and election code was not followed on their
watch.

The good news is the current national party, i.e., America’s Independent
Party is getting organized around the country.

I am sorry I did not get back sooner, but I was up late last night at Barona
on they way home from by flight south from San Francisco. I was in San
Francisco helping the AIP’s Chairmans lawsuit in the United States District
Court to get John S. McCain III off the California ballot, because he was
born in the City of Colon, Republic of Panama and not in the Panama Canal
Zone as the McCain campaign is asseverating.

John S. McCain III was born in the Panama Canal Company Hospital in the
City of Colon on August 29, 1936. At that time the entire City of Colon
was on an island and not part of the Canal Zone. Therefore, under 8 USC
section 5e he was “colectively naturalized” a United States Citizen on
August 4, 1937 only if McCain’s father was employed by the United States Goverment on August 29, 1936 and was present in the Republic of Panama at the time of conseption (near or on December 5, 1935) under the current reading of the interpretation of the Department of States Foreign Affairs Manuel. McCain was born an alian under United States Law to an American Citizen mother who’s employment status did not include
John S. McCain III any rights to United States Citizenship under S2416.
Therefore, the status of preported marriage between John S. McCain II
and Roberta McCain n’ee Wright at Caesar’s Bar in Tijuana, Mexico of
January 21, 1933 becomes very important, viz., was the witnesses to the
marriage in Mexico the required 48 hours before they acted as such, under
the law in Baja California, or did they drive down in the same automobile
with Jack and Roberta that day from Long Beach, California. Remember
also Reberta Wright was a minor at the time Jack McCain took her across
the California- Baja California Border on January 21, 1933. Further Jack
and Roberta between January 21, 1933 until August 29, 1936 never vist a
common law marriage state.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party.

BTW, how was that State Committee meeting, in which you disaffiliated from the CP, legally valid? Yet you did not notify many of the committee members.

Why was the planned convention in Sacramento in early July canceled in the first place Mark?

Read California Election Code sections 7637 and 7640. The officers are
elected by the state central committee and not the convention. It was
claimed by Jim King’s lawyer and by Don Grundmann that they were elected at the bogus “Los Angeles Convention”. This is not law in California.

That

Chuck Baldwin was even on the Lou Dobbs show recently, and attended the Ron Paul press conference.

Can Alan top that?

You claim that Kansas doesn’t count, but its being disputed, so unless a Judge says the SoS is justified in his grounds, it isn’t official that we’re not going to be on.

You just said that the August 15th date is related to the State Convention only, yet the State Convention took place AFTER the 15th, and Ed became Chair after the 15th; Its funny, but I thought that we elect our officers at the Convention, as it says we’re supposed to do in the ‘General Business’ Section of the State Convention Chapter in the Election Codes.

I can’t find anything saying that we can elect the Chairman for the Party itself in the Election Codes that address the State Committee Chapter.

I guess we made another boo-boo.

So Ed being made State Chair at the State Committee meeting isn’t legal either, is it?
After all, the Election Codes only allows a ‘temporary Chairman’ to be elected for the State Committee meeting.