<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AKIP continues to support Chuck Baldwin</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-851171</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-851171</guid>
					<description>I really never did get why the secessionist AIP supported Lincoln loving anti-secessionist, Alan Keyes. That really makes no sense whatsoever. Had they declared their independence during a Keyes administration, he no doubt would have sent in the troops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I really never did get why the secessionist <span class="caps">AIP</span> supported Lincoln loving anti-secessionist, Alan Keyes. That really makes no sense whatsoever. Had they declared their independence during a Keyes administration, he no doubt would have sent in the troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cody Quirk</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-850147</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-850147</guid>
					<description>If they did, then Baldwin will not be on their ballot.

They previously supported Alan Keyes, but didn't have a problem with the national convention results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If they did, then Baldwin will not be on their ballot.</p>
	<p>They previously supported Alan Keyes, but didn&#8217;t have a problem with the national convention results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: drifter</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-849497</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/02/akip-continues-to-support-chuck-baldwin/#comment-849497</guid>
					<description>So they are not happy with palin on ONE issue? If that is the case, I know palin and baldwin differ on many, so they really must disagree with baldwin on a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So they are not happy with palin on <span class="caps">ONE</span> issue? If that is the case, I know palin and baldwin differ on many, so they really must disagree with baldwin on a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
