“The fact that they didn’t charge bin Laden really proves nothing. Bin Laden’s own words were used to say he did it. What good is charging him going to do anyways.”

Umm, because indictments are a standard part of the legal process. It means you have evidence linking an individual to a crime. And if you go to the FBI link there is ZERO reference to 9/11 for OBL. Like him or not, Ventura is being factual. Was the above a serious comment? How old are you?

The fact that they didn’t charge bin Laden really proves nothing. Bin Laden’s own words were used to say he did it. What good is charging him going to do anyways.

Let me see if I understand the argument. On one hand you guys claim this is the dumbest administration, but they are able to pull off the most elaborate inside job in history?

The “let it happen” crowd has far more credibility and evidence than the people who believe the administration was behind it.

Common sense will often reveal the true answer.

I’m simply waiting on this so called evidence and facts you claim to have. None of which has been presented.

Now about JV’s points…....oh that’s right, you have nothing to back up your “troofer douche” remark as JV is right about the FBI website so you changed the subject.

Wake up and good-bye.

I’m waiting for your explanation which you clearly have none. Obviously proof is not needed for the troofers.

You can go with whatever assumption you want about flight 77. After all, you know more than actual pilots.

I have listened to Ventura on numerous occasions and his only response to when someone questions him is “were you a Navy SEAL. I do not need to listen to his egotistical rants to know where he stnads.

I’ll even go with the assumption that a plane did not hit the Pentagon. Now you tell me where it disappeared to. I’ll be waiting.

Now you attacked JV, still waiting on your reply to the above links. As usual anti-truth people don’t have one. Whether one likes him or not the points JV made are entirely accurate.

I never commented on flight 77. However if you’d like to debate it with this group of people go right ahead:

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core.html

But I know, you’re more knowledgeable than these men and women because of the many hours you’ve spent flying commercial and military aircraft.

Everything you mentioned could have been accomplished without pulling the towers. Nevermind the logistics make it impossible to do without anyone noticing.

Still waiting on you to tell me where Flight 77 went to.

As usual, logic isn’t a troofers strong suit.

1. An invasion of two countries, possibly three

2. Patriot Act

3. MCA

4. DHS

5. TSA

6. HR 5122

You’ve proved you’re a gutless know-nothing. Now:

Here’s what JV was referring to:

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

Here’s what JV said the at rally:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KqEErhR9-M&feature=related

Keep fighting the good fight there troofer. Loose Change is god and a failed fiction writer knows about engineering.

I’ll tell you what, name another time in history when an airliner full of fuel crashed into steel buildings and I’ll compare the two.

And no, there is no motive for an inside job of 9/11. Bush did not need to pull the towers to go to war with Iraq. The hijackings and crashing into buildings would have been reason enough to go to war with Iraq.

And I’m still waiting on one of you troofers to tell me where Flight 77 disappeared to. Since it didn’t hit the Pentagon did a UFO come and abduct it?

Writing books doesn’t make one establishment. Nader and Paul have probably authored or co-authored a dozen books combined, maybe more.

he always has been a part of the establishment. just like michael moore, media benjamin, he’s a stealth operative, an illusionary alternative to the status quo.

“He wasn’t when he was elected governor.”

you’re confusing je$$e’s schtick with facts. je$$e the candidate opposed NAFTA, je$$e the governor supported it & Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China; he went to China on behalf of $lick Willie Clinton.

He wrote two books , used state provided security while promoting them & made lots of money…........like “establishment” politicians do

“he’s not now.”

when he’s out of office he reverts back to being the tough guy who will rock the boat.

Once in office, it didn’t take the Reform Party very long to see the real je$$e