Comments on: Independent Green Party of Virginia puts Baldwin on Ballot

by: Donna Miller

Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:09:09 +0000

It’s too bad that the Independent Greens tried to get publicity by misrepresenting themselves. They privately told Richard Winger that they were going to give their signatures to Baldwin and Castle, and then they turned around and publicly scolded him for reporting the truth instead of all of their hype about Bloomberg and Paul.

That’s typical of their party, unfortunately. Their party did not even exist until 2004, but they try to put their history all the way back to at least 1992. Another one of their tricks is to talk about all of the candidates that they have “endorsed/nominated”, in order to exaggerate the number of candidates they have run. Many of the candidates that they “endorsed/nominated” were not Independent Greens, but independents, some of whom refused their endorsement or even knew that they were being endorsed!

by: Baldwin Campaign volunteer

Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:02:31 +0000

Why is the hyperlink for Chuck Baldwin and Darrell Castle incorrect? The website is NOT baldwin.com, but baldwin08.com or baldwin2008.com . Please correct this.

by: DonaldRLake

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:18:38 +0000

Independence Party schills
see Frank MacKay and John Blare
for more details.
Or maybe visit them at
‘Independence Party’
National Convention
[and three ring circus:
Reform Farties
Independence Green Farties
and
Independence Farties]
in October 2008
Looooooong Island NY!

by: Tex Wood

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:37:59 +0000

I’ll lay you a dollar to a donut that none of the people making these comments ever put anyone on any Presidential ballot line anywhere…and probably have never put anyone on any ballot anywhere.

Granted, the Independent Green Party of Virginia has a large umbrella, but it does give voters alternatives to the Republocrats. The voters then decide.
What opportunities have any of the above “commentators” given to any alternatives? What we have is the clear distinction between hot air and hard work.

by: me

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:46:47 +0000

Who is the National Socialist Green Party running this year? www.nazi.org

by: David

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:59:49 +0000

Donna:
Their antics got them more coverage!
Bizarre, but successful!

by: Chip

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:47:11 +0000

“Right On…Jason…Where’s Gus Hall and Linda Jeness(sp?) when their contry needs them????”

Wrong parties. Gus Hall, who is dead, was in the Communist Party. Linda Jenness the Socialist Workers. Neither of which is the Socialist Party USA.

by: Kathy Cummings

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:22:51 +0000

Did you mention the Green Party is now on the Ohio ballot?
There’s a good story there.

Write back, if you need contacts.

Blessed be,
Kathy Cummings
IL Green Party Candidate for US Senate

by: Porter Rockwell

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:16:06 +0000

Right On…Jason…Where’s Gus Hall and Linda Jeness(sp?) when their contry needs them????

by: Jason

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:35:33 +0000

“I’ll say it again, the Socialist Party, USA is the ONLY third party that is not chock full of a cadre of nut jobs and kooks.”

Surely you were joking…

by: James W. Clifton

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:16:56 +0000

I’ll say it again, the Socialist Party, USA is the ONLY third party that is not chock full of a cadre of nut jobs and kooks.

by: Freelancer

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:17:48 +0000

I never thought in all my living days there would be such a political alliance.

by: Donna Miller

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:57:54 +0000

If they pledged their signatures to Chuck Baldwin months ago, why did they bother with all of these antics about Bloomberg, Paul, and Pickens? It just makes third parties look bad in the media, which is already unfriendly to us in general.

by: Andy Craig

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:44:12 +0000

These are the bizarre people that seem to think everyone who’s not a Republican or a Democrat is interchangeable with any other non-Rep/Dem.