<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul is not running for President</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: George Dance</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-944201</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-944201</guid>
					<description>Well, it turns out there will be a third-party debate, to which Baldwin, Barr, Mckinney, and Nader (as well as McBama) have been invited. So far it's internet only, but I'm hoping there will be some TV added as interest builds. Please read: 

Third-party debate in early October
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5032.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, it turns out there will be a third-party debate, to which Baldwin, Barr, Mckinney, and Nader (as well as McBama) have been invited. So far it&#8217;s internet only, but I&#8217;m hoping there will be some TV added as interest builds. Please read:</p>
	<p>Third-party debate in early October<br />
<a href='http://www.nolanchart.com/article5032.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nolanchart.com/article5032.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Dance</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-928180</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-928180</guid>
					<description>I know there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a &quot;third-party&quot; debate Oct. 6 between the Prohibition Party, the Boston Tea Party, and one of the Socialist parties. But it sounds to me like Nader is talking about a debate between the candidates who meet his &quot;fair and manageable standard&quot;: himself, Barr, McKinney (whom he mentions) and Baldwin (whom he doesn't).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I know there <i>is</i> a &#8220;third-party&#8221; debate Oct. 6 between the Prohibition Party, the Boston Tea Party, and one of the Socialist parties. But it sounds to me like Nader is talking about a debate between the candidates who meet his &#8220;fair and manageable standard&#8221;: himself, Barr, McKinney (whom he mentions) and Baldwin (whom he doesn&#8217;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Dance</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-928166</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-928166</guid>
					<description>According to Nader a third party debate is set to occur in the next few weeks. Please read: 

http://www.nolanchart.com/article4969.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>According to Nader a third party debate is set to occur in the next few weeks. Please read:</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.nolanchart.com/article4969.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nolanchart.com/article4969.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Clark</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-879792</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-879792</guid>
					<description>republicrat steve blithers: &quot;I would have voted for Ron Paul,but now I have to pick between Obama/Biden vs.McCain/Palin.

...no you don't, you republicrat dummy!!

...btw, it doesn't speak well of you or anyone else, steve, who hasn't yet figured out that voting for/affirming ANY OF THESE REPUBLICRAT FUCKS (who wag about illion$ not knowing the truth about/reality of one, etc. ad goddamned nauseam!) IS A BAD IDEA!!

...?certainly you republicrat dummies realize that your one stinking 'vote' having a bearing on the outcome of 'the (fraud) election' is a HUGE FUCKING MATHEMATICAL IMPROBABILITY!..(even if they count the fucking things honestly!)

(alas..one wonders if one's wasting one's breath talking to dumbass republicrats who appear to have a hard time counting, etc.. and whom don't even know what the fuck 'it' i$ they're counting, etc. ad goddamned nauseam) ;o)

..but have a great day!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>republicrat steve blithers: &#8220;I would have voted for Ron Paul,but now I have to pick between Obama/Biden vs.McCain/Palin.</p>
	<p>...no you don&#8217;t, you republicrat dummy!!</p>
	<p>...btw, it doesn&#8217;t speak well of you or anyone else, steve, who hasn&#8217;t yet figured out that voting for/affirming <span class="caps">ANY OF THESE REPUBLICRAT FUCKS </span>(who wag about illion$ not knowing the truth about/reality of one, etc. ad goddamned nauseam!) <span class="caps">IS A BAD IDEA</span>!!</p>
	<p>...?certainly you republicrat dummies realize that your one stinking &#8216;vote&#8217; having a bearing on the outcome of &#8216;the (fraud) election&#8217; is a <span class="caps">HUGE FUCKING MATHEMATICAL IMPROBABILITY</span>!..(even if they count the fucking things honestly!)</p>
	<p>(alas..one wonders if one&#8217;s wasting one&#8217;s breath talking to dumbass republicrats who appear to have a hard time counting, etc.. and whom don&#8217;t even know what the fuck &#8216;it&#8217; i$ they&#8217;re counting, etc. ad goddamned nauseam) ;o)</p>
	<p>..but have a great day!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Jones</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-877729</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-877729</guid>
					<description>A SOLID/UNITED 3RD PARTY WOULD ROCK THE POLITCAL SCENE!   I beleive it is a possibility.   I am sure all 3rd parties agree &quot;we the people&quot; can not continue with the usual D or R concept and would BENIFIT GREATLY to a UNITED/SOLID 3RD PARTY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">A SOLID</span>/UNITED 3RD <span class="caps">PARTY WOULD ROCK THE POLITCAL SCENE</span>!   I beleive it is a possibility.   I am sure all 3rd parties agree &#8220;we the people&#8221; can not continue with the usual D or R concept and would <span class="caps">BENIFIT GREATLY</span> to a <span class="caps">UNITED</span>/SOLID 3RD <span class="caps">PARTY</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: I am an American</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876728</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876728</guid>
					<description>Patrick, just because he's a Pastor, doesn't make his platform religion-based.

Steve, IF you EVER supported Ron Paul, and switching to Osama/BInlaDIN, you are a Retard with no principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Patrick, just because he&#8217;s a Pastor, doesn&#8217;t make his platform religion-based.</p>
	<p>Steve, IF you <span class="caps">EVER</span> supported Ron Paul, and switching to Osama/BInlaDIN, you are a Retard with no principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry Breazeale,Msgt.(ret.)USAF</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876717</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876717</guid>
					<description>HEY! IF THAT IS TRUE, I think it is a great idea! We in the Constitution party and the 'veterans outreach arm'..the NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION say...&quot;BRING IT ON&quot;!  Chuck Baldwin will bring the house down! We will match OUR CP PLATFORM against ANYBODY ELSE, first, second or other THIRD party candidate! All the American public has to do is actually HEAR &amp;#38; SEE Chuck Baldwin...and its curtains for everyone else!
                                     WHY?
Because, it is 100% exactly what RON PAUL stands for, ALL ACROSS THE BOARD. &quot;NO OTHER&quot; Presidential candidate CAN SAY THAT!
                                 &quot;GET-R-DONE!&quot;
          Larry Breazeale, Msgt. (ret.) USAF,
          NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION...www.nvets.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">HEY</span>! IF <span class="caps">THAT IS TRUE</span>, I think it is a great idea! We in the Constitution party and the &#8216;veterans outreach arm&#8217;..the <span class="caps">NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION</span> say&#8230;&#8221;BRING <span class="caps">IT ON</span>&#8221;!  Chuck Baldwin will bring the house down! We will match <span class="caps">OUR CP PLATFORM</span> against <span class="caps">ANYBODY ELSE</span>, first, second or other <span class="caps">THIRD</span> party candidate! All the American public has to do is actually <span class="caps">HEAR </span>&#038; SEE Chuck Baldwin&#8230;and its curtains for everyone else!</p>
	<p>                                     <span class="caps">WHY</span>?<br />
Because, it is 100% exactly what <span class="caps">RON PAUL</span> stands for, <span class="caps">ALL ACROSS THE BOARD</span>. &#8220;NO <span class="caps">OTHER</span>&#8221; Presidential candidate <span class="caps">CAN SAY THAT</span>!<br />
                                 &#8220;GET-R-DONE!&#8221;<br />
          Larry Breazeale, Msgt. (ret.) <span class="caps">USAF</span>,<br />
          <span class="caps">NATIONAL VETERANS COALITION</span>&#8230;www.nvets.org
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fielding J. Hurst</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876503</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-876503</guid>
					<description>OK, I am officially jealous of Montana now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK, I am officially jealous of Montana now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RPfan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873877</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873877</guid>
					<description>Here's the link you for your uncertainties and unending speculations: 
http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/ron_paul_will_be_on_presidential_ballot/5423/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here&#8217;s the link you for your uncertainties and unending speculations:<br />
<a href='http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/ron_paul_will_be_on_presidential_ballot/5423/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/ron_paul_will_be_on_presidential_ballot/5423/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fielding J. Hurst</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873791</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873791</guid>
					<description>Steve, This is not a true statement ... &quot;I would have voted for Ron Paul,but now I have to pick between Obama/Biden vs.McCain/Palin.&quot;

You CHOOSE to pick an R or D, don't HAVE TO ... http://brushfires2008.com/2008/08/27/lesser-evil-revisited/

Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.
–John Quincy Adams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve, This is not a true statement &#8230; &#8220;I would have voted for Ron Paul,but now I have to pick between Obama/Biden vs.McCain/Palin.&#8221;</p>
	<p>You <span class="caps">CHOOSE</span> to pick an R or D, don&#8217;t <span class="caps">HAVE TO </span>&#8230; <a href='http://brushfires2008.com/2008/08/27/lesser-evil-revisited/' rel='nofollow'>http://brushfires2008.com/2008/08/27/lesser-evil-revisited/</a></p>
	<p>Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.<br />
&#8211;John Quincy Adams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Losty</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873425</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873425</guid>
					<description>Isn't he on in MT and LA already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Isn&#8217;t he on in MT and LA already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Tanner</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873135</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873135</guid>
					<description>Continue the Revolution, wave and place President BARR signs. 
Barr will be on the ballot, Paul will not. 

http://www.artypeinc.com/store/ 

http://bobbarr.meetup.com/65/photos/ 

We get positive response in our area with 
President BARR wave and yard signs (80 cents)

Since Bob Barr was elected as the Libertarian candidate for President,  his campaign provided more positive comments and interviews in the news media, about the Libertarian Party, than all the previous Libertarian candidates.  

As a Libertarian, I am proud to be connected with Ron Paul and Bob Barr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Continue the Revolution, wave and place President <span class="caps">BARR</span> signs.<br />
Barr will be on the ballot, Paul will not.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.artypeinc.com/store/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.artypeinc.com/store/</a></p>
	<p><a href='http://bobbarr.meetup.com/65/photos/' rel='nofollow'>http://bobbarr.meetup.com/65/photos/</a></p>
	<p>We get positive response in our area with<br />
President <span class="caps">BARR</span> wave and yard signs (80 cents)</p>
	<p>Since Bob Barr was elected as the Libertarian candidate for President,  his campaign provided more positive comments and interviews in the news media, about the Libertarian Party, than all the previous Libertarian candidates.</p>
	<p>As a Libertarian, I am proud to be connected with Ron Paul and Bob Barr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John C Jackson</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873084</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873084</guid>
					<description>Anyone who hasn't been in a cave has noticed how terrible ballot access drives have been going and numerous problems with states not allowing substitution,etc. If states don't even allow a Libertarian placeholder being replaced by another libertarian actually selected by the party, there is no way in hell that some guy is just going to walk in in the 11th Hour and be allowed access as a replacement candidate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anyone who hasn&#8217;t been in a cave has noticed how terrible ballot access drives have been going and numerous problems with states not allowing substitution,etc. If states don&#8217;t even allow a Libertarian placeholder being replaced by another libertarian actually selected by the party, there is no way in hell that some guy is just going to walk in in the 11th Hour and be allowed access as a replacement candidate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873027</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-873027</guid>
					<description>How is the fact Ron Paul isn't running &quot;news&quot;?

Which retarded would think that two candidates would drop out and make way for somebody who declared he's not running?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>How is the fact Ron Paul isn&#8217;t running &#8220;news&#8221;?</p>
	<p>Which retarded would think that two candidates would drop out and make way for somebody who declared he&#8217;s not running?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven R Linnabary</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-872858</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/08/ron-paul-is-not-running-for-president/#comment-872858</guid>
					<description>All it would take is for a few candidates to the Electoral College to announce they would be unfaithful electors and vote for Ron Paul.

The voters would still vote for Barr or Baldwin, possibly pushing up their vote totals.  Win/Win!

PEACE
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>All it would take is for a few candidates to the Electoral College to announce they would be unfaithful electors and vote for Ron Paul.</p>
	<p>The voters would still vote for Barr or Baldwin, possibly pushing up their vote totals.  Win/Win!</p>
	<p><span class="caps">PEACE</span><br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
