<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Baldwin finds Sarah Palin&#8217;s answers &#8216;very troubling&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-925973</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-925973</guid>
					<description>&quot;Take a good look at Alan Keyes to vote for President. He is great.&quot;

Yeah, he's great if you want to go to war against nuclear armed Russia. Real great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Take a good look at Alan Keyes to vote for President. He is great.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Yeah, he&#8217;s great if you want to go to war against nuclear armed Russia. Real great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Seidenberg</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-918651</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-918651</guid>
					<description>TO  Ferenc

Take a good look at Alan Keyes to vote for President.  He is  great.  That is why the American Independent Party is supporting him.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">TO  </span>Ferenc</p>
	<p>Take a good look at Alan Keyes to vote for President.  He is  great.  That is why the American Independent Party is supporting him.</p>
	<p>Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ferenc</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-917996</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-917996</guid>
					<description>No matter what anybody say about Mr. Baldwin. He is the best Presidental candidate.

       God Bless</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No matter what anybody say about Mr. Baldwin. He is the best Presidental candidate.</p>
	<p>       God Bless
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Speas</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-914018</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-914018</guid>
					<description>FYI - Chuck Baldwin will be in Northern NJ (close to NYC) for a reception on Sept 26.  From the http://www.constitutionparty-nj.org/ website:

The entire public is cordially invited on September 26 from 7:00pm – 10:00pm to meet Chuck Baldwin, Constitution Party candidate for president, as he travels to New Jersey to meet with voters face-to-face.  This event is free to the public and will be held at the Firehouse Restaurant, 455 St. Georges Ave. in Rahway, NJ.  This will be a great opportunity for the public to meet-and-greet a presidential candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">FYI </span>- Chuck Baldwin will be in Northern <span class="caps">NJ </span>(close to <span class="caps">NYC</span>) for a reception on Sept 26.  From the <a href='http://www.constitutionparty-nj.org/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.constitutionparty-nj.org/</a> website:</p>
	<p>The entire public is cordially invited on September 26 from 7:00pm &#8211; 10:00pm to meet Chuck Baldwin, Constitution Party candidate for president, as he travels to New Jersey to meet with voters face-to-face.  This event is free to the public and will be held at the Firehouse Restaurant, 455 St. Georges Ave. in Rahway, NJ.  This will be a great opportunity for the public to meet-and-greet a presidential candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-913310</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-913310</guid>
					<description>Stefan,

&quot;John L: McCain will not overturn Roe &amp;#38; Wade nor likely appoint judges that would be likely to do that, as in that case those judges would also overturn McCain-Feingold. Also, the Bush admin, that was supposed to be pro-life has done zero to change the issue, even with a GOP majority for 6 years! There are a few choice R’s but then also a few pro-life D’s and could have had a majority.&quot;

Interesting analysis, Stefan, concerning the McCain-Feingold aspect and you are certainly right to say that Bush has done nothing that has concretely improved the death culture. If anything his stem-cell compromise actually damaged it, much to the consternation of the USCCB and the Vatican. I never forgave nor will I ever forgive him for that perfidy. But I think you may be overly concerned with the point of McCain-Feingold, as well thought out as it is. It certainly used to be that those most interested in the overturning of Roe would be trusting enough of a Republican president and his appointees, but after David Souter that's over. McCain, if he were to get the opportunity to appoint someone, just might have to take his chances on McCain-Feingold to keep a lid on his own administration. The reaction to Meirs comes to mind as instructive here. What concerns me most about a McCain appointment, though, is that while it would most likely be reliable concerning Roe, it would most likely be reliable on the unitary executive as well and that part scares me. Non-ideological pro-lifers, largely Catholics and some Reformed Protestants, would be loath to buy into a Faustian deal that gave them an abortion-free America at the cost of having a Caudillo in the place of a President and that's precisely what it promises to mean. The Reichschurch, on the other hand, the Dobson, Lands, Colsons, Falwells, Neuhauses and Weirichs wouldn't much care about being ruled by a Fuehrer. They're all terribly parenta - if not authoritarian - as it is. Catholics need to give a lot of serious thought to the proported cultural  benefits of a McCain Administration. Actually, Baldwin is a much better choice on these questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Stefan,</p>
	<p>&#8220;John L: McCain will not overturn Roe &#038; Wade nor likely appoint judges that would be likely to do that, as in that case those judges would also overturn McCain-Feingold. Also, the Bush admin, that was supposed to be pro-life has done zero to change the issue, even with a <span class="caps">GOP</span> majority for 6 years! There are a few choice R&#8217;s but then also a few pro-life D&#8217;s and could have had a majority.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Interesting analysis, Stefan, concerning the McCain-Feingold aspect and you are certainly right to say that Bush has done nothing that has concretely improved the death culture. If anything his stem-cell compromise actually damaged it, much to the consternation of the <span class="caps">USCCB</span> and the Vatican. I never forgave nor will I ever forgive him for that perfidy. But I think you may be overly concerned with the point of McCain-Feingold, as well thought out as it is. It certainly used to be that those most interested in the overturning of Roe would be trusting enough of a Republican president and his appointees, but after David Souter that&#8217;s over. McCain, if he were to get the opportunity to appoint someone, just might have to take his chances on McCain-Feingold to keep a lid on his own administration. The reaction to Meirs comes to mind as instructive here. What concerns me most about a McCain appointment, though, is that while it would most likely be reliable concerning Roe, it would most likely be reliable on the unitary executive as well and that part scares me. Non-ideological pro-lifers, largely Catholics and some Reformed Protestants, would be loath to buy into a Faustian deal that gave them an abortion-free America at the cost of having a Caudillo in the place of a President and that&#8217;s precisely what it promises to mean. The Reichschurch, on the other hand, the Dobson, Lands, Colsons, Falwells, Neuhauses and Weirichs wouldn&#8217;t much care about being ruled by a Fuehrer. They&#8217;re all terribly parenta &#8211; if not authoritarian &#8211; as it is. Catholics need to give a lot of serious thought to the proported cultural  benefits of a McCain Administration. Actually, Baldwin is a much better choice on these questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-913034</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-913034</guid>
					<description>Stefan, I am not now nor have I ever been on the Palin bandwagon, but the fact that Brooks, Frum, Will, Krauthammer etc. have concerns is one reason to like her. They are elitist snobs, less concerned with experience than pedigree. Oh no, she went to the University of Idaho like a normal person. I didn't support Meirs for SCOTUS either, but much af the same dynamic was at work. As it was with Huckabee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Stefan, I am not now nor have I ever been on the Palin bandwagon, but the fact that Brooks, Frum, Will, Krauthammer etc. have concerns is one reason to like her. They are elitist snobs, less concerned with experience than pedigree. Oh no, she went to the University of Idaho like a normal person. I didn&#8217;t support Meirs for <span class="caps">SCOTUS</span> either, but much af the same dynamic was at work. As it was with Huckabee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912907</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912907</guid>
					<description>It seems like poor Palin may be needing a metaphorically sweater soon, as the bounce seems to have peacked. McCain's shrewd choice is also highly risky:

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&amp;#38;u_sid=10435997
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=2&amp;#38;ei=5070&amp;#38;emc=eta1&amp;#38;oref=slogin&amp;#38;oref=slogin

John L: McCain will not overturn Roe &amp;#38; Wade nor likely appoint judges that would be likely to do that, as in that case those judges would also overturn McCain-Feingold. Also, the Bush admin, that was supposed to be pro-life has done zero to change the issue, even with a GOP majority for 6 years! There are a few choice R's but then also a few pro-life D's and could have had a majority.
McCain would not change anything on this issue, he is on record...one wonders how many pro-lifers would be fooled into voting for him based on allegedly pro-life positions. Some &quot;pro-choicers&quot; have even said the US has some of the most liberal laws re. abortion and it should be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It seems like poor Palin may be needing a metaphorically sweater soon, as the bounce seems to have peacked. McCain&#8217;s shrewd choice is also highly risky:</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&#038;u_sid=10435997' rel='nofollow'>http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&#038;u_sid=10435997</a><br />
<a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=2&#038;ei=5070&#038;emc=eta1&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin' rel='nofollow'>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=2&#038;ei=5070&#038;emc=eta1&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
	<p>John L: McCain will not overturn Roe &#038; Wade nor likely appoint judges that would be likely to do that, as in that case those judges would also overturn McCain-Feingold. Also, the Bush admin, that was supposed to be pro-life has done zero to change the issue, even with a <span class="caps">GOP</span> majority for 6 years! There are a few choice R&#8217;s but then also a few pro-life D&#8217;s and could have had a majority.<br />
McCain would not change anything on this issue, he is on record&#8230;one wonders how many pro-lifers would be fooled into voting for him based on allegedly pro-life positions. Some &#8220;pro-choicers&#8221; have even said the US has some of the most liberal laws re. abortion and it should be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912831</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912831</guid>
					<description>John L: The CP is still working with the AIP (AK), NIP (Nebraska) and IAP (NV). It is surprising in how many states Baldwin/Castle are as &quot;Independent candidate&quot; and not under any party political organisation.
http://www.constitutionparty.com/ba_stats.php

Apropo sweater: the news is about Palin's dramatic change in dress/style, which is perhaps the equivalent of Baldwin moving from sweater to a suit... :-) Todd Palin has been a member of the AIP and I can also understand it, he is of part Eskimo descent - I think - and no wonder he would not have something to do with dominance from DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John L: The CP is still working with the <span class="caps">AIP </span>(AK), <span class="caps">NIP </span>(Nebraska) and <span class="caps">IAP </span>(NV). It is surprising in how many states Baldwin/Castle are as &#8220;Independent candidate&#8221; and not under any party political organisation.<br />
<a href='http://www.constitutionparty.com/ba_stats.php' rel='nofollow'>http://www.constitutionparty.com/ba_stats.php</a></p>
	<p>Apropo sweater: the news is about Palin&#8217;s dramatic change in dress/style, which is perhaps the equivalent of Baldwin moving from sweater to a suit&#8230; <img src='http://thirdpartywatch.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Todd Palin has been a member of the <span class="caps">AIP</span> and I can also understand it, he is of part Eskimo descent &#8211; I think &#8211; and no wonder he would not have something to do with dominance from DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912717</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-912717</guid>
					<description>Red, 

So the CP is finally rid of its association with the AIP? Now if someone would only hand Baldwin a sweater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Red,</p>
	<p>So the CP is finally rid of its association with the <span class="caps">AIP</span>? Now if someone would only hand Baldwin a sweater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911903</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911903</guid>
					<description>Mark S. has done us a favor and revealed that the reason the rump CA AIP broke away is not only because they have a pathological hatred of Chuck Baldwin, but also because they are straight up interventionists. Keyes is the interventionist's interventionist. He made this clear post the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia. Good riddance to these treacherous war-mongering keyboard warriors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mark S. has done us a favor and revealed that the reason the rump <span class="caps">CA AIP</span> broke away is not only because they have a pathological hatred of Chuck Baldwin, but also because they are straight up interventionists. Keyes is the interventionist&#8217;s interventionist. He made this clear post the Georgian invasion of South Ossetia. Good riddance to these treacherous war-mongering keyboard warriors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Red Phillips</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911890</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911890</guid>
					<description>Baldwin is a dispensationalist, but he is not an interventionists. I'm sure that there are dispensationalists in smaller countries around the world who are not interventionists also. Dispensationalism does not inherently lead to interventionism re. Israel. It seems to be a peculiarly American manifestation of it. It is the combination of dispensationalism and American exceptionalism that makes for a volatile mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Baldwin is a dispensationalist, but he is not an interventionists. I&#8217;m sure that there are dispensationalists in smaller countries around the world who are not interventionists also. Dispensationalism does not inherently lead to interventionism re. Israel. It seems to be a peculiarly American manifestation of it. It is the combination of dispensationalism and American exceptionalism that makes for a volatile mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911348</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-911348</guid>
					<description>I'm not Christian. This sometimes makes me a little wary about the Constitution party. I am however a supporter of principled third party candidates, so I bring up Baldwin's name (among others) to anybody that I can get to listen.

I'm very pleased to see that Baldwin has such a reasonable view on foreign policy. The idea of Palin being in charge of our military is truly frightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not Christian. This sometimes makes me a little wary about the Constitution party. I am however a supporter of principled third party candidates, so I bring up Baldwin&#8217;s name (among others) to anybody that I can get to listen.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m very pleased to see that Baldwin has such a reasonable view on foreign policy. The idea of Palin being in charge of our military is truly frightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David D....</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-910801</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-910801</guid>
					<description>Doc. Baldwin just called them like he saw them as he has said countless times this election is about 'Constitutionalists verses Globalists' and that is what McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden are globalists, they are two sides of the same political coin and there is but a handful of personal and political differences seperating them! 


He (Baldwin) is reading between the lines and making an political observation in an election year, and in this instance and in this case Doc. Baldwin is spot on right. BALDWIN/CASTLE 2008 OR BUST!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Doc. Baldwin just called them like he saw them as he has said countless times this election is about &#8216;Constitutionalists verses Globalists&#8217; and that is what McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden are globalists, they are two sides of the same political coin and there is but a handful of personal and political differences seperating them!</p>
	<p>He (Baldwin) is reading between the lines and making an political observation in an election year, and in this instance and in this case Doc. Baldwin is spot on right. <span class="caps">BALDWIN</span>/CASTLE 2008 <span class="caps">OR BUST</span><img src="!" alt="" border="0" /><img src="!" alt="" border="0" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-910329</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-910329</guid>
					<description>I would not consider Palin a neocon per se. One wishes Baldwin, with his theological background, could have gone into the influence of his dispensationalist religious beliefs, with the political consequences of it and uncritically supporting the neocons agenda. Palin’s “dispensationalist” worldview puts her in philosophical lockstep with a huge part of the neocon programme. She
will as VP have a very limited influence in government and foreign policy anyway, and will be more a postergirl for McCain-Lieberman to implement their &quot;Bush doctrine on steroids&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would not consider Palin a neocon per se. One wishes Baldwin, with his theological background, could have gone into the influence of his dispensationalist religious beliefs, with the political consequences of it and uncritically supporting the neocons agenda. Palin&#8217;s &#8220;dispensationalist&#8221; worldview puts her in philosophical lockstep with a huge part of the neocon programme. She<br />
will as VP have a very limited influence in government and foreign policy anyway, and will be more a postergirl for McCain-Lieberman to implement their &#8220;Bush doctrine on steroids&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Northern Exposure</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-909902</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/chuck-baldwin-finds-sarah-palins-answers-very-troubling/#comment-909902</guid>
					<description>Russian submarines to test-fire nuke missiles in Pacific      
Tuesday, 16 September 2008  
From correspondents in Moscow 

September 13, 2008 06:59am 
Article from: Agence France-Presse 

RUSSIAN submarines armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles will 
test-fire their rockets in the Pacific Ocean between September 15 and 
20, a military official was quoted as saying today. 

&quot;Some missile launches will be carried out in the Sea of Okhotsk and the 
Bering Sea&quot; and will hit targets on the Kamchatka peninsula in eastern 
Russia, said the unidentified official, RIA Novosti news agency reported. 

A press officer for the governor of Kamchatka, a mountainous region 
often used for missile tests, told RIA Novosti that local authorities 
had been forewarned and would inform the local population in due course. 

Russia's Pacific Fleet, which will carry out the tests, has Delfin 
nuclear submarines equipped with RSM-54 intercontinental ballistic 
missiles that can reach targets as far as 8300 km away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Russian submarines to test-fire nuke missiles in Pacific<br />
Tuesday, 16 September 2008<br />
From correspondents in Moscow</p>
	<p>September 13, 2008 06:59am<br />
Article from: Agence France-Presse</p>
	<p><span class="caps">RUSSIAN</span> submarines armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles will<br />
test-fire their rockets in the Pacific Ocean between September 15 and<br />
20, a military official was quoted as saying today.</p>
	<p>&#8220;Some missile launches will be carried out in the Sea of Okhotsk and the<br />
Bering Sea&#8221; and will hit targets on the Kamchatka peninsula in eastern<br />
Russia, said the unidentified official, <span class="caps">RIA </span>Novosti news agency reported.</p>
	<p>A press officer for the governor of Kamchatka, a mountainous region<br />
often used for missile tests, told <span class="caps">RIA </span>Novosti that local authorities<br />
had been forewarned and would inform the local population in due course.</p>
	<p>Russia&#8217;s Pacific Fleet, which will carry out the tests, has Delfin<br />
nuclear submarines equipped with <span class="caps">RSM</span>-54 intercontinental ballistic<br />
missiles that can reach targets as far as 8300 km away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
