<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Ralph was right&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Impeach Bush</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-917643</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-917643</guid>
					<description>Catholic, you hate on W so much, but you support Obomba? What will Obama do differently that what Bush is doing right now? He will keep our troops abroad, and will do nothing for the better of our society. Howerver, Ralph Nader, if elected, would have a great impact on America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Catholic, you hate on W so much, but you support Obomba? What will Obama do differently that what Bush is doing right now? He will keep our troops abroad, and will do nothing for the better of our society. Howerver, Ralph Nader, if elected, would have a great impact on America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laine</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-914285</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-914285</guid>
					<description>It's sad that Nader gets next to no recognition for his consistent warnings to Congress on the crisis of Fannie and Freddie. His name should be all over the networks for calling this years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s sad that Nader gets next to no recognition for his consistent warnings to Congress on the crisis of Fannie and Freddie. His name should be all over the networks for calling this years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Donna Miller</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911747</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911747</guid>
					<description>&quot;Meanwhile, I might leave this site soon to go register at IPR and Last Free Voice. With only one story a day often, God is clearly losing favor with it. Amen.&quot;

Please, do us all a favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, I might leave this site soon to go register at <span class="caps">IPR</span> and Last Free Voice. With only one story a day often, God is clearly losing favor with it. Amen.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Please, do us all a favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Donna Miller</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911738</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911738</guid>
					<description>Luke,

It's primarily Gore's fault for running such a lackluster campaign.  He admitted that himself in 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Luke,</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s primarily Gore&#8217;s fault for running such a lackluster campaign.  He admitted that himself in 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911286</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911286</guid>
					<description>I voted for Nader in 2000, he was the candidate I liked most. Honestly, who is the logical person to blame for Bush winning? Is it Me, for voting my conscience? Is it Nader for giving me a choice that I desired? or is it maybe, just maybe the fault of the people who voted for the frat boy Bush &quot;cuz they wanted to get drunk with him&quot;?

Hating on candidates for asinine reasons is the territory of the big two. Please leave the principled third party candidates out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I voted for Nader in 2000, he was the candidate I liked most. Honestly, who is the logical person to blame for Bush winning? Is it Me, for voting my conscience? Is it Nader for giving me a choice that I desired? or is it maybe, just maybe the fault of the people who voted for the frat boy Bush &#8220;cuz they wanted to get drunk with him&#8221;?</p>
	<p>Hating on candidates for asinine reasons is the territory of the big two. Please leave the principled third party candidates out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911207</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-911207</guid>
					<description>Icke just insulted General Obama, so I no longer support him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Icke just insulted General Obama, so I no longer support him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-910381</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-910381</guid>
					<description>I do this because I am an eccentric person who likes to do something meaningful to the world. I am a Catholic, I am a Trotskyist and I am a supporter of Barack Obama. It is a new way of being, and even if I am entirely serious about my beliefs about Nader controlling Bush, and all other world leaders for that matter, I am also not quite serious. I am speaking in the language of analogical divine metaphor, like the bible. The bible is not meant to be taken literally, yet each passage contains some spiritual truth. That's what I mean by Barack Obama conquering death.

I am currently listening to David Icke, one of the great theorists of our time, on the George Noory show. I am hopefully that tonight he will expose Ralph Nader as a reptillion before a natural audience. Meanwhile, I might leave this site soon to go register at IPR and Last Free Voice. With only one story a day often, God is clearly losing favor with it. Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I do this because I am an eccentric person who likes to do something meaningful to the world. I am a Catholic, I am a Trotskyist and I am a supporter of Barack Obama. It is a new way of being, and even if I am entirely serious about my beliefs about Nader controlling Bush, and all other world leaders for that matter, I am also not quite serious. I am speaking in the language of analogical divine metaphor, like the bible. The bible is not meant to be taken literally, yet each passage contains some spiritual truth. That&#8217;s what I mean by Barack Obama conquering death.</p>
	<p>I am currently listening to David Icke, one of the great theorists of our time, on the George Noory show. I am hopefully that tonight he will expose Ralph Nader as a reptillion before a natural audience. Meanwhile, I might leave this site soon to go register at <span class="caps">IPR</span> and Last Free Voice. With only one story a day often, God is clearly losing favor with it. Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Donna Miller</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909655</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909655</guid>
					<description>If you really were Catholic, you would believe that Jesus Christ conquered death, not Barack Obama.  

If you're doing this to make fun of Robert Milnes and his &quot;Progressive Alliance&quot; strategy, I think that you extracted all the possible humor from that situation months ago.  It's getting really old now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If you really were Catholic, you would believe that Jesus Christ conquered death, not Barack Obama.</p>
	<p>If you&#8217;re doing this to make fun of Robert Milnes and his &#8220;Progressive Alliance&#8221; strategy, I think that you extracted all the possible humor from that situation months ago.  It&#8217;s getting really old now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Catholic Trotskyist</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909536</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909536</guid>
					<description>Jonathan, I am not Kenny. Kenny is a neo-capitalist deviationist trogledyte. And I believe Richgriffin was actually writing in support of your ideas. I had no problem with you Jonathan when you were constantly posting appeals for donations to Barr. What made you even consider Nader instead and make you actually post comments that don't involve appealing for donations to Barr? If you had wanted to vote for Barr you still could have been on God's side, although I am becoming convinced that Barr is purposefully trying to destroy the Libertarian Party. That leaves the Constitution Party, divided and over-radical as it may be, to provide a right-wing unintentional machine for the Obama Revolution by stealing Republican votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jonathan, I am not Kenny. Kenny is a neo-capitalist deviationist trogledyte. And I believe Richgriffin was actually writing in support of your ideas. I had no problem with you Jonathan when you were constantly posting appeals for donations to Barr. What made you even consider Nader instead and make you actually post comments that don&#8217;t involve appealing for donations to Barr? If you had wanted to vote for Barr you still could have been on God&#8217;s side, although I am becoming convinced that Barr is purposefully trying to destroy the Libertarian Party. That leaves the Constitution Party, divided and over-radical as it may be, to provide a right-wing unintentional machine for the Obama Revolution by stealing Republican votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Donna Miller</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909175</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-909175</guid>
					<description>The second biggest recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is none other than the one CatholicTrotskysist calls &quot;God’s candidate, our Holy Revolutionary General, the Conquerer of Life and Death, Barack H. Obama&quot;.  &quot;Change&quot; we can believe in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The second biggest recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is none other than the one CatholicTrotskysist calls &#8220;God&#8217;s candidate, our Holy Revolutionary General, the Conquerer of Life and Death, Barack H. Obama&#8221;.  &#8220;Change&#8221; we can believe in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908628</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908628</guid>
					<description>its sad to hear Third Party voters repeat the myth that because of Nader in the 2000 election he made Bush President.  When it is a fact that:
&quot;Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush&quot; -San Francisco    In addition, half of all registered Democrats did not even bother going to the polls and voting. 

By this logic, It is noteworthy that every third-party candidate ( another 7 Presidential candidates ) received enough votes in Florida to have cost Al Gore the election. 

And there are countless other reasons why Nader did not cost the election such as the Butterfly ballot, Palm Beach votes going to Buchanan, the Supreme court ruling, absentee ballots and especially CNN polls showing Nader pulled a great many votes from Republicans but I waste my time trying to prove RichGriffin or Catholic Trotsky or Kenny wrong even if I am speaking to 3 different people, which I highly doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>its sad to hear Third Party voters repeat the myth that because of Nader in the 2000 election he made Bush President.  When it is a fact that:<br />
&#8220;Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush&#8221; -San Francisco    In addition, half of all registered Democrats did not even bother going to the polls and voting.</p>
	<p>By this logic, It is noteworthy that every third-party candidate ( another 7 Presidential candidates ) received enough votes in Florida to have cost Al Gore the election.</p>
	<p>And there are countless other reasons why Nader did not cost the election such as the Butterfly ballot, Palm Beach votes going to Buchanan, the Supreme court ruling, absentee ballots and especially <span class="caps">CNN</span> polls showing Nader pulled a great many votes from Republicans but I waste my time trying to prove RichGriffin or Catholic Trotsky or Kenny wrong even if I am speaking to 3 different people, which I highly doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DonaldRLake</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908619</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908619</guid>
					<description>Reality check, reality check:

Jonathon, from personal, face to face experience I can tell you that Uncle Ralph is not ALWAYS right. But after seeing him and his bumbling law students on summer vacation stumble and fall through out P2004, I am truely impressed with the more -than -any -one -but -Democans -and -Republicrats 46 state ballots this year. Truly amazing! 

Richgriffin, DebbieKat, Derek:  You are not wrong ---but you are misguided! 

It is not rich Americans who got the 'deal of a life time' in the bail out. After being warned time and time again, FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS  and FOREIGN BANKS got refunded. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not backed by the US Government ----unless you are China, or Barclays, or some other big shot non citizen.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Reality check, reality check:</p>
	<p>Jonathon, from personal, face to face experience I can tell you that Uncle Ralph is not <span class="caps">ALWAYS</span> right. But after seeing him and his bumbling law students on summer vacation stumble and fall through out <span class="caps">P2004</span>, I am truely impressed with the more -than -any -one -but -Democans -and -Republicrats 46 state ballots this year. Truly amazing!</p>
	<p>Richgriffin, DebbieKat, Derek:  You are not wrong&#8212;-but you are misguided!</p>
	<p>It is not rich Americans who got the &#8216;deal of a life time&#8217; in the bail out. After being warned time and time again, <span class="caps">FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS </span> and <span class="caps">FOREIGN BANKS</span> got refunded. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not backed by the <span class="caps">US </span>Government&#8212;&#8212;unless you are China, or Barclays, or some other big shot non citizen&#8230;..........</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: will</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908566</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908566</guid>
					<description>haha i only wish nader controlled the world through some underground organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>haha i only wish nader controlled the world through some underground organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richgriffin</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908433</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908433</guid>
					<description>And here I thought Bush and his thugs stole the 2000 election! You know, disenfranchising black voters, &quot;hanging chads&quot;, forcing the corporate news media to change their projected winner, and so much more! But NO, it's Ralph &quot;Criminal&quot; Nader!! He STOLE votes away from the Democrat and single-handedly made Bush the President. Come to think of it, I must be a criminal, too, because I had the nerve to vote for Nader, and did so 3 times!! (:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And here I thought Bush and his thugs stole the 2000 election! You know, disenfranchising black voters, &#8220;hanging chads&#8221;, forcing the corporate news media to change their projected winner, and so much more! But NO, it&#8217;s Ralph &#8220;Criminal&#8221; Nader!! He <span class="caps">STOLE</span> votes away from the Democrat and single-handedly made Bush the President. Come to think of it, I must be a criminal, too, because I had the nerve to vote for Nader, and did so 3 times!! (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: citizen1</title>
		<link>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908431</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/09/17/ralph-was-right/#comment-908431</guid>
					<description>Glen Beck had Ron Paul on because he predicted this in 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Glen Beck had Ron Paul on because he predicted this in 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
