Nader says polls indicate he’s helping Obama

The following is a media release from the Nader presidential campaign:

September 23, 2008
www.votenader.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: (Washington) Toby Heaps, 202-471-5833, toby@votenader.org

POLLS INDICATE NADER HELPS OBAMA
Is Nader a Republican ‘spoiler’ this year?

Contrary to conventional wisdom, Ralph Nader’s presence on the ballot in 2008 actually helps Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama, according to at least five national polls conducted over the past three months, as well as a Florida poll conducted last week and a Virginia poll this week.

In each of the national polls, Obama’s spread over Republican candidate John McCain widened by an average of more than 3 percent when Nader and Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr were included on the menu of choices.

Nader appears to be more of a factor than Barr. Nader was ahead of Barr in four of the polls and tied in the other. On average, Nader polled 2 percent higher than Barr.

The CNN/Time Magazine/Opinion Research Corp. for Florida that came out this past Wednesday showed Obama and McCain tied at 48 percent. But when third-party candidates were added to the mix, Obama retained his ground, and McCain dropped back 4 percent.

CNN/Time Magazine/Opinion Research Corp
Date: 9/14-16
Florida
Added: 9/18/08

Barack Obama 48%
John McCain 44%
Ralph Nader 4%
Bob Barr 1%
Cynthia McKinney 1%

In a Sept 21, Washington Post-ABC News Poll of registered voters in Virginia, Obama has a 6-point margin over McCain, besting the Arizona Senator 50 percent to 44 percent. When third-party candidates Ralph Nader and Bob Barr are added to the mix, Obama’s spread over McCain grows to an 8-point margin (Obama = 51 percent, McCain = 43 percent), with Barr and Nader both chalking up 2 percent each.

Last week the Nader/Gonzalez campaign announced that it will be on the ballot in 45 states plus the District of Columbia, this November—a record for Nader. Voters will also be able to write in Nader/Gonzalez in four more states: Texas, Georgia, Indiana and North Carolina, for a total of 49 states plus D.C. Oklahoma is the only holdout. In his two previous runs for president, Nader was on 34 ballots in 2004, and 44 in 2000.

Asked if he expected 2008 to be a repeat of 2000, Nader says, “Our nation is in a terrible economic crisis, entrenched in two wars, the party in power—the Republicans—are clueless how to get us out of this mess. The Democrats should be walking away with this, but they aren’t. Why? Instead the Democrats are polling neck and neck with former Keating Five candidate John McCain.

“Is it any wonder that American voters are fed up and looking for alternate candidates to vote for? We are not the ones who have spoiled this country. They have. Our solutions are in sync with the American public. We want to end the wars and bring real single-payer healthcare and a living wage to all Americans. If that earns us votes, we are proud of that. If the Democrats would be a true opposition party and stop voting with the Republicans and betraying the public trust on issue after issue—offshore oil drilling, FISA, the Iraq war, Patriot Act—then they might actually win for a change.”

“We all have to earn our votes, and in this volatile election year, that is as true as ever,” Nader added.

The Nader Effect is Actually an Obama Bump
Summaries of major national polls over the past three months

Obama’s Obama’s Margin Margin Obama’s Without With Nader
Date Source Nader Nader Bump Los Angeles Times/
25-Jun Bloomberg Poll 12% 15% 3%

06-Jun CNN/ORC Poll 3% 4% 1%

16-Jul Reuters/Zogby Poll 7% 10% 3%

24-Jul NBC/Wall Street

Journal Survey 6% 13% 7%

21-Aug NBC/Wall Street

Journal Survey 3% 5% 2%

18-Sept CNN/ORC Poll (FL)* 0% 4% 4%

21-Sept Wash Post* 6% 8% 2%
ABC News Poll (VA)

Note: Each of these polls with Nader also included Barr.

*Data for a single state only (Florida or Virginia).

Sources:
http://www.calendarlive.com/media/acrobat/2008-06/40351172.pdf
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1529
http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJ_Poll_072308.pdf
http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJ_NBCPoll_prtl_082108.pdf
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/17/battleground.poll/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/17/battleground.poll/index.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/interactives/campaign08/virginia/092208_poll.html

In the key swing state of Michigan—whose Democratic voters were partially disenfranchised by the Democratic National Committee—an EPIC-MRA poll found Nader at 8-10 percent. Nader is also polling as high as 6-8 percent in other key battleground states: Colorado (7%), Pennsylvania (7%), New Mexico (8%) and Nevada (6%). (http://www.time.com/time/2008/poll_main.pdf).
“It’s clear that Ralph Nader could again have a significant impact on the Presidential race—though in highly unpredictable ways,” Time/CNN pollsters concluded.

10 Responses to “Nader says polls indicate he’s helping Obama”

  1. Justin Anthony Knapp Says:

    Unfortunately, this probably won’t do anything to debunk the spoiler canard.

    -JAK

  2. Shell Says:

    Please write to Janet Brown b@debates.org at The Commission on Presidential Debates and call the Obama team at 1- 866-675-2008 telling them politely that its vital for democracy that viable third party candidates be included in the debates including this Fridays.
    Just complaining that we have no freedoms as third party supporters does no good like any important issue in history it takes a positive proactive stance.

  3. Shell Says:

    oops that the correct address for Janet Brown at the Commission on Presidential Debates is : jb@debates.org

  4. Jonathan Says:

    Nader is always worried he is accused of taking votes from Obama. It is true he takes votes from McCain as well. As a Republican I have voted for Nader in the past so I’m living proof. However, he should not be afraid of taking votes from Obama. I would proudly say YES i want their votes. I want all votes.
    BTW, I am supporting Barr this election although I respect and admire Ralph tremendously.
    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opinion/sfl-brmail938pnsep23,0,4882086.story

  5. Jonathan Says:

    This is a great YOU TUBE VIDEO that I hope all of you no matter which Third party candidate you vote for will forward to the average American. it was made by the Nader campign but it shows how similar Obama is to McCain

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5WiE6MnmCM

  6. Odin Says:

    Now that McCain is forfeiting Obama has to debate Nader and Barr

  7. OPEN REAL DEBATES Says:

    Time to accept a scripted Presidential “debate” yet again?
    Brought to you by your “good friends” on Wall Street.

    No USA Main Street Paul or Nader,
    nor Cynthia McKinney…

  8. Richgriffin Says:

    I wish the election were finally over!! Which terrible President will we have next year?? The one who will lead us further towards fascism, or the other murderous thug who will slow down progressivism and send soldiers to die in vain in a few less countries than McCain?? How I wish everyone would just vote for Ralph Nader, so we could get our country back!! If Obama were smart, he’s insist that if McCain drops out of the debate he will invite the other four candidates and debate them instead. (Obama is NOT smart). The polls that ask about all candidates are much more accurate than the polls the corporate mainstream media keep shoving at us.

  9. True Debate Says:

    The 1992 Presidential Debates with Ross Perot were not dull. His warnings have now come true. Replace John McCain with Ron Paul. Add Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney. Barack Obama must earn his victory, not win by default.

    Washington University ‘81

  10. Fred Jakobcic Says:

    To use an artificial number to deny some from debating is akin to censorship to keep their views from being known to a larger audience. The mainstream media has been a failure in informing the public anf fostering a real democratic political process. The coverage is a failure and the event a scripted event and staged event that offers little in substance much in smoke. There are at least five candidates who are on enough state ballots to win a majority in the U.S. Electoral College. The artificial polling numbers were put designed to keep third parties out of the debates and from receiving attention that may bring their numbers up and them to the attention of the public. The duopoly, the two major parties do not want attention drawn to their failures. to the negative effects of globalization and the sacrifice of environmental and labor standards and the subervision of democracy that has resulted. Also missing from the debates is the debage on economic inequality and that many are denied health care and a living wage. People cannot live on hot air, on broken promises on wors they want to hear but with no actual results.

Leave a Reply