I think that it is absolutely ludicrous that Oklahoma and North Carolina have no legal procedure in place to even allow for a write in.”

Write-in’s are allowed, the Baldwin campaign missed the deadline.

http://www.ballot-access.org/ballot-chart.html

You can see the candidates that didn’t make the states ballot are write-in candidates. You’ll have your choices.

Am I a bastion of liberty, John? I’m a sovereign individual, do you respect free speech? You seem to always attack my right to say thins rather than what it is that I’m saying.

But many election personals will count the write ins without the 21 electors. So if your in PA, call your local election place to see how they count the write-ins

Chuck Baldwin was the only candidate that actively campaigned for Ron Paul during the Republican Primaries. As president, Chuck will do what Ron Paul would have done. Now, Ron Paul has endorsed Chuck Baldwin, with good reason.

Chuck Baldwin has gone on record saying that he would like to make Ron Paul Secretary of the Treasury, and we all know what that would do for America.

If all Ron Paul supporters would rally together and actively campaign for and support Chuck Baldwin, we just might win. Otherwise, we might have to settle for Obama or McCain, and I think we can agree that would not be tolerable.

If you have already committed to vote for Chuck Baldwin, or if you would vote for him if you thought he had a chance, go to http://www.TheWhatIfList.org and sign up. Send as many people as you can. You will be notified when there are enough people for Chuck to have a real chance to win, and you can walk into the voting booth with confidence.

My NE Ohio ballot will include, in this order:

Baldwin/Castle (CP)
Barr/Root (LP of Ohio)
Duncan/Johnson
McCain/Palin®
McKinney/Clemente (GP of USA)
Moore/Alexander (Socialist Party USA)
Nader/Gonzalez
Obama/Biden (D)

Plus, a section for write ins:

D. Allen/Borcik
J. Allen/Stath
Germalic/Wishnatsky
Alan Keyes/Rohrbough
Robertson/Falls
Schriner/Way

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance151.html

http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/20081012/NEWS01/810120333

(Depending on Maine and Conn. for Barr).

That was simply an aside comment. My point was that opposition to free trade polls well with the masses. You indicated it would be a drag on the CP. It may well be among a small set of ideological free-traders who might otherwise consider the CP, but it would likely help them with the public at large. Hence my recommendation for you to get out more.

...this republicrat dummy squawks as if “the economy” must be ‘operated’...like some fucking gigantic, smoking lawnmower!..(hint for dr. blowzo: methinks a MUCH better economy will happen without ‘operation’ by a bunch of republicrat gonzos who don’t even know what a fucking ‘dollar’ is!)

...and as to ‘taxation’/republicrat ‘economics’..it all sucks..but a slight nod to the CP dummies who want to directly tax foreigners compared to the goddamned republicrat fools who want to continue directly taxing americans!

...(and all you goddamned republicrat ‘economics’ blowholes need to learn even just a little reality as to the origin, nature, etc. of ‘the money..’ you surely are worse than ignorant here..)

...but have a good day!. ;o)

Then you appear to be out of touch with how the world currently operates. Whether we like it or not, globalism is the only way to currently operate the economy. Free trade agreements should be a normal part of the economic discussions. There is a difference between what we want, and what would actually work.

Dr. Gonzo, I’m not a protectionist per se. I am against sovereignty sacrificing trade agreements. But opposition to free trade consistently polls well. When NAFTA was being debated, it was opposed by a large majority and was opposed more by self-identified Republicans than Democrats. Some of the people on here REALLY need to get out more.