Comments on: NPR’s interview with Bob Barr http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:29:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: David in Akron http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-982744 Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:26:13 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-982744 Hallmonster: Good points. Thanks for the reply. Hallmonster:

Good points. Thanks for the reply.

]]> by: Hallmonster http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978734 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:56:16 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978734 @ David in Akron: Well, let's say Iraq had WMD back in 2003. You and I would probably both agree that that doesn't necessarily mean that they are a threat to us. Many nations have WMD (Pakistan, India, China and so on...). I think we would also both agree that Bush was not justified in the invasion and occupation of Iraq in any form. That's Bush's way of doing things. Now look at Bush/McCain/Obama's language towards the Iran situation and compare that to Barr's. Barr is not the one we should be worried about. @ David in Akron:

Well, let’s say Iraq had WMD back in 2003. You and I would probably both agree that that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are a threat to us. Many nations have WMD (Pakistan, India, China and so on…). I think we would also both agree that Bush was not justified in the invasion and occupation of Iraq in any form. That’s Bush’s way of doing things.

Now look at Bush/McCain/Obama’s language towards the Iran situation and compare that to Barr’s. Barr is not the one we should be worried about.

]]> by: David in Akron http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978448 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:45:19 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978448 A follow up to my last post, Fellow Libertarians, How is this comment different than Bush's WMD Iraq argument. "Those that do us harm, or are poised to do us harm and have the capability and the weaponry and the intent to do so, ought to be taken out." A follow up to my last post,

Fellow Libertarians,
How is this comment different than Bush’s WMD Iraq argument.

“Those that do us harm, or are poised to do us harm and have the capability and the weaponry and the intent to do so, ought to be taken out.”

]]> by: David in Akron http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978442 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:41:45 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978442 In the interview, I couldn't tell if he meant defensive force or preemptive force when he was talking about threatening targets in Afghanistan. The "we will use force" comment caught me off guard, from a Libertarian perspective. In the interview, I couldn’t tell if he meant defensive force or preemptive force when he was talking about threatening targets in Afghanistan. The “we will use force” comment caught me off guard, from a Libertarian perspective.

]]> by: Brian D http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978400 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:45:21 +0000 http://thirdpartywatch.com/2008/10/10/nprs-interview-with-bob-barr/#comment-978400 Barr really kicks ass on radio and tv interviews. He is every bit as polished as McBama. The more people hear him the more want to vote for him. Barr really kicks ass on radio and tv interviews. He is every bit as polished as McBama. The more people hear him the more want to vote for him.

]]>