The Motion was: Move to appoint an investigative committee consisting of Andrew Watkins, Roman Garcia, and Rob Vinson to investigate the claims of Ms. Harlos’ derivative action. The motion passed. Readers will note that the non-Mises group on the LNC only abstained on the motion…there were no negative votes..
Co-sponsors: Andrew Watkins, Roman Garcia, Travis Bost, Angela McArdle
The motion required a majority (9 votes) to pass. The motion passed unanimously with a final vote total of 12-0-4-0 (Aye-Nay-Expressed Abstention-Not Voting).
Voting Aye:
Ms. McArdle
Mr. Watkins
Mr. Bost
Mr. Nekhaila
Mr. Vinson
Ms. Yeniscavich
Mr. Haman
Mr. Garcia
Mr. McGee
Ms. Hays
Mr. Dassing
Mr. Ford
Voting Nay:
None
Expressed Abstentions:
Mr. Rutherford
Mr. Redpath
Mr. Nanna
Mr. Darr
Not Voting:
None
Daniel, it’s already been all over that Malagon told Harlos that Redpath and Rutherford are next. I can’t explain Nanna or Darr except grow a pair.
I don’t want you to think I am disparaging them, they are all Libertarians I have massive respect for and I am willing to assume they know more than me about whats going on and how best to handle it.
But all of this should be kept in memory, I would argue these are clear NAP violations and those who would do so for their own gains need to vlbe barred from leadership.
“We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong.”
I seriously wonder how many non-nises are not voting negatove because they fear reprisal and removal by MC members? And if that is the case how does the party of the non aggression principle have the co trolling faction use fear and intimidation to get compliance or complacency on its votes