Mike Seebeck <mike.seebeck@gmail.com>
In re: Adoption of Special Investigatory Report and Other Resolutions Adopted at June 9, 2025 Special Meeting (Roos et al. vs. LNC)
Regarding this appeal, the Judicial Committee has reached the following decisions:
| Question on Reliefs Requested | Vote | |
| A | Should the LNC adoption of the SIC report on June 9 be voided for violation of Article 3 of the Bylaws and the Statement of Principles? A YES vote is to void the adoption, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 6-0 |
| B | Should the LNC adoption of the SIC report on June 9 be voided and not part of official party records? A YES vote is to void the adoption, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 7-0 |
| C | Should the LNC adoption of the SIC report on June 9 be voided and remanded back to the LNC for further consideration? A YES vote is to void the adoption, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 7-0 |
| D | Should the Judicial Committee void the adoption of the SIC report on June 9 even if it is procedurally valid? A YES vote is to void the adoption, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 7-0 |
| E | Should the Judicial Committee void the censure motion of August 24 even if it is procedurally valid? A YES vote is to void the censure, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 7-0 |
| F | Should the Judicial Committee void the funds recovery motion of August 24 even if it is procedurally valid? A YES vote is to void the funds recovery motion, a NO vote is to sustain it. | NO, 6-1 |
| G | Should the Judicial Committee declare that Party actions based on alleged material representation be null and void even if they are procedurally valid? A YES vote is to make such a declaration, a NO vote is to not make such a declaration. | NO, 7-0 |
| H | Should the Judicial Committee declare that McArdle did not violate any fiduciary duty or commit embezzlement? A YES vote is to make such a declaration, a NO vote is to not make such a declaration. | NO, 7-0 |
Opinions are posted at https://lpedia.org/wiki/In_re:_Adoption_of_Special_Investigatory_Report_and_Other_Resolutions_Adopted_at_June_9,_2025_Special_Meeting_(Roos_et_al._vs._LNC)
For the Judicial Committee,
Michael Seebeck, Chair
They rejected Jonathan’s ahistorical and acontextual ganesmanship about the SoP. Thus is what happens when one does no activism, has no root in thus party, with a mercenary membership.
Like I told JM Jacobs in another thread, there was no evidence of intentional misrepresentations or violation of SoP regarding the SIC.
The JC saw that as well.
Roos, Martin and JJ were grasping for straws trying to protect Angela McArdle.
And I am not sure why.
She was a complete failure as LNC chair and embezzled membership funds on her way out.
Hopefully, this is now over and LNC can move on.
Although, I would like them to try to go after the money she stole.