Last updated on June 11, 2024
Edit: This is a challenge being sent to the Judicial Committee. It requires the signatures of 10% of the National Committee delegates or 1% of the LP’s Sustaining Members. A signature form collecting those signatures with checkboxes for delegates and for members may be found at https://form.jotform.com/241615578233155
Libertarian Party of Wisconsin
Region 1 Agreement Dispute Petition
Subject
The Libertarian Party of Wisconsin’s (LPWI) participation in the region 1 was not authorized, per the LPWI bylaws, which means that the regional agreement is null and void, therefore it was not a consensual agreement needed per the Libertarian National Committee (LNC) bylaws.
The LP Secretary was notified of the non-consent continuing to violate the bylaws of the LNC.
We also stated our removal from the agreement to the chairs and vice chairs of the states in the region, before the applicable deadline. The agreement stated it took effect after applicable deadlines, so our removal from the region was within the agreement terms, and therefore, applicable as well.
Ruling Requested
Wisconsin demands our removal from Region 1 along with the removal of the applicable “party sustaining membership” from the region, along with the removal of a representative if the 10% of party sustaining membership threshold is not met after the removal of Wisconsin from Region 1, per LNC bylaws.
Petitioners:
The Libertarian Party of Wisconsin and The Libertarian Party of Wisconsin Executive Committee
Affected Parties:
LNC Representatives:
Region 1 Representatives: Adam Haman and Roman Garcia
Region 1 Alternates: Andrew Chadderdon and Nick Shawhan
The following state affiliates:
AK, AZ, CO, HI, ID, KS, KY, MI, MN, MT, NE, NM, NV, OR, WI
Details
The Chair of the Libertarian Party of Wisconsin (LPWI) signed the Region 1 agreement without authorization from the Executive Committee (ExCom). He did not consult the ExCom and kept silent for over a week before he informed the ExCom of his actions. During the ExCom meeting where he finally informed us, two members spoke out against the chair’s decisions and lack of consulting the ExCom, however, since there was no notification, there wasn’t a coordinated way to address the issue at the moment. Following the announcement, there was a meeting to discuss the issue, hosted, and called in order, by the LPWI Chair, and it was confirmed unanimously (other than the chair) that the chair had no authorization to sign the agreement, that the chair’s actions were against the bylaws, and he did not have consent of the ExCom. He was also directed to withdraw.
Meeting minutes:
To address the issue of “ordinary business,” changing regions has never been an “ordinary business” item, and previous ExCom meetings provide precedent. In 2020, the issue was discussed and voted on. This meeting included Stephen Ecker. In 2022, after notifying an updated agenda item to change regions, a mere days before the ExCom, there was a huge outcry from many members of the ExCom and members of the party due to the “late notice”. There was much discussion on the item, including from our current chair, Stephen Ecker. The meeting most likely had a record attendance at the ExCom that included both ExCom members and party members, and was likely also a record length meeting due to this topic. This is not an “ordinary business” item.
The meeting minutes, including Mr. Ecker’s involvement is documented here:
A video of both meetings, with far more detail, is available on request.
Without the context of previous ExCom meetings, “ordinary business” does not have a well-defined meaning in RONR, which means that LPWI ExCom has the sole discretion of what that meaning is, again, per RONR. We can concede a renewal may be ordinary business, but fundamentally changing an agreement is not. Despite its schedule, there is nothing “ordinary” about the decision. It is also stated in our bylaws that the ExCom is in “control and management of all the affairs […] of the party”. Which makes it clearly the jurisdiction of the ExCom.
Furthermore, the agreement was signed with a possible financial obligation that, again, the Chair is not authorized to make. Our bylaws clearly show that the ExCom is responsible for funds, and spending money of the party, but the agreement binded us to a negotiation that, in the end, is out of the control of the LPWI ExCom.
| LPWI Constitution and Bylaws:
Constitution Article V Section 2
By-Laws ARTICLE IV – Finance and Accounting
|
| Region 1 agreement:
Region 1 agreement “Travel Compensation”: It is anticipated that the LNC will meet in-person at least two times a year which poses a financial obligation on the representative(s) in order to attend. The Regional Chairs agree that upon election of any Regional Representative, they will enter into a separate agreement, if requested by the Regional Representative, for either the Regional Representative or the Regional Alternate to attend each meeting at a maximum amount of $1,000 per meeting spread amongst the Regional States for a maximum of two meetings per year, whether or not the LNC meets more frequently. This separate agreement may allocate the cost-sharing equally or proportional upon the percentage of national sustaining membership in the Regional States. |
After the meeting discussing the lack of authorization, the LP Secretary was notified of the lack of authorization, and therefore non-consent of the agreement and the findings of the meeting. The LNC Bylaws dictate that the agreement must be signed with consent. Our notice was disregarded.
Email Notice:
LNC Bylaw Article 7 Section 2, Part C: “Affiliate parties may, by mutual consent, band together to form ‘representative regions,’ […]”
We also stated our removal from the agreement to the chairs and vice chairs of the states in the region, before the applicable deadline of region formations. The agreement stated it took effect after applicable deadlines, so our removal from the region was within the agreement.
Region 1 Agreement “Effective Date of Agreement”: After this agreement has come into effect and subject to any deadlines imposed by the national Party Bylaws for final formation of a representative region for a term, a state affiliate can only join or withdraw with a majority consent of all of the other state signatory affiliates through their State Chairs.
We call on the LNC Judicial Committee to absolve Wisconsin of the regional agreement, and rectify Region 1’s representation on the LNC. I would also like to remind the LNC Judicial Committee that LPWI Bylaw interpretation is at the sole discretion of the LPWI body, and not in scope of the LNC Judicial Committee. Any issues with the LPWI ExCom interpretation can be brought up to the LPWI Judicial Committee.