There are three forthcoming LNC and related committee meetings. They may be available on Zoom.
Aug 24, 2025 07:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) LNC Special Meeting Resolutions and Appointments.
Sep 3, 2025 08:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Judicial Committee hearing on J.J.’s appeal.
Sep 7, 2025 07:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) LNC Monthly Meeting
Libertarians need to read this book on management. “Everything I Know About Business I Learned from the Grateful Dead: The Ten Most Innovative Lessons from a Long, Strange Trip”
The ruling of the chair may be appealed, though it appears that there may be enough votes to sustain the ruling.
The first resolution could potentially be amended at the LNC meeting, into a form that would violate the bylaws. (The proposed form does not violate the bylaws.)
There may be discussions regarding the appeal, if the action is resolved at the 8/24 meeting. Note, however, that the Judicial Committee may wish to hear the case, even the parties resolve it. That is their call.
I see my other post was not approved, George please approve this one as I wish to make it clear that the appellant is not acting as the Mises parliamentarian in the appeal (that is a separate role) but filed it as a sustaining member.
Jensen?? I think you mean the Mises parliamentarian. And obviously I cannot say this for certain, but IF the resolutions pass on 8/24, it seems to me the appeal is void. In fact I think it is void now. The resolutions being appealed no longer exist as Nekhaila ruled them out of order. But then again the JC held a nonsensical hearing on my attempted removal for daring to challenge Dear Leader after they themselves voided the BS charges. But as of right now, the JC should be cancelling that appeal hearing as mooted.
Roberts lets you rule a motion out of order after it has been passed?
Not to mention after the meeting has gone away?
Yes, in certain circumstances that create a “breach of a continuing nature.” One of those circumstances is if there is a violation of a rule protecting absentees (23:6 e). Notice exists to protect absentees.
Note that Bohler correctly cited this in his point of order.